Gotham Insurance Company v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 141

ORDER APPROVING 140 STIPULATION RE 134 MOTION TO DE-DESIGNATE LIFESCAN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND PRODUCTION OF SAME. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 4/27/2016. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Eric L. Troff, Esq., CSB #110031 BAER & TROFF, LLP 35 N. Lake Avenue, Ste. 670 Pasadena, CA 91101 (310) 802-4202 telephone (626) 568-2800 facsimile Attorneys for Defendants Instacare Corp. and PharmaTech Solutions, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Case No.: 5:13-CV-03810-BLF GOTHAM INSURANCE COMPANY, ) ) ) Plaintiff in Interpleader, ) ) ) vs. ) ) SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, ) ) INSTACARE CORP. and ) PHARMATECH SOLUTIONS, INC. ) ) ) Defendants in Interpleader. __________________________________ ) ) AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM. ) ) STIPULATION RE MOTION TO DEDESIGNATE LIFESCAN SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND PRODUCTION OF SAME; AND [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON 21 22 23 WHEREAS, Defendant PharmaTech Solutions, Inc. (hereafter “PharmaTech”) 24 filed a Motion to De-Designate the Settlement Agreement (hereafter “LifeScan 25 Settlement Agreement”) between LifeScan Scotland Ltd. on the one hand, and Shasta 26 Technologies, LLC (hereafter “Shasta”) and Conductive Technologies, Inc., on the 27 other hand, in that matter entitled LifeScan Scotland Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC, 28 1 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 2 DATED: April 27, 2016 OGLOZA FORTNEY LLP 3 4 By:__ ______________________ 5 DAVID FORTNEY, Attorneys for Defendant Shasta Technologies, LLC 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER 1 [PROPOSED ] ORDER 2 3 4 5 Pursuant to the Stipulation of counsel, AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Shasta’s counsel will produce to PharmaTech’s counsel the LifeScan 6 Settlement, unredacted and without any confidentiality designation, 7 within five business days after this Stipulation and Proposed Order is 8 signed by the Court. 9 2. 10 The hearing on PharmaTech’s Motion to De-Designate is taken off calendar as moot. 11 12 13 14 DATED:_ , 2016 ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?