Ferranti v. Hewlett-Packard Company

Filing 60

ORDER GRANTING 59 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Vincent Ferranti, Carlos Martinho. The Clerk shall close this file. Motions terminated: 53 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/9/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)

Download PDF
9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vincent Ferranti and Carlos Martinho 10 J R NIA w a rd J u d ge E d . D av i l a E R DATED: 2/9/2016 C N F D IS T IC T O R H 8 RT 7 NO 6 FO 5 D RDERE OO IT IS S LI 4 RT U O 3 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA A 2 Michael A. Caddell (SBN 249469) mac@caddellchapman.com Cynthia B. Chapman (SBN 164471) cbc@caddellchapman.com CADDELL & CHAPMAN 1331 Lamar, Suite 1070 Houston, TX 77010-3027 Telephone: (713) 751-0400 Fascimile: (713) 751-0906 UNIT ED 1 S Case 5:13-cv-03847-EJD Document 59 Filed 02/06/16 Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 VINCENT FERRANTI, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Plaintiff, Case No. 5:13-cv-03847 EJD NOTICE AND STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE v. HEWLETT-PACKARD CO., Defendant. Action Filed: August 20, 2013 Trial Date: Not set Case 5:13-cv-03847-EJD Document 59 Filed 02/06/16 Page 2 of 2 1 2 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the Parties hereby stipulate to, 3 4 5 6 and the Plaintiffs thereby, voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice. The Clerk shall close this file. CADDELL & CHAPMAN / s / Michael Caddell 7 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiffs Vincent Ferranti and Carlos Martinho 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP / s / Timothy W. Loose Timothy W. Loose Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard Company

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?