Ferranti v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Filing
60
ORDER GRANTING 59 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Vincent Ferranti, Carlos Martinho. The Clerk shall close this file. Motions terminated: 53 First MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint filed by Hewlett-Packard Company. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/9/2016. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/9/2016)
9
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Vincent Ferranti
and Carlos Martinho
10
J
R NIA
w a rd J
u d ge E d
. D av i l a
E R DATED: 2/9/2016 C
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
H
8
RT
7
NO
6
FO
5
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
LI
4
RT
U
O
3
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
A
2
Michael A. Caddell (SBN 249469)
mac@caddellchapman.com
Cynthia B. Chapman (SBN 164471)
cbc@caddellchapman.com
CADDELL & CHAPMAN
1331 Lamar, Suite 1070
Houston, TX 77010-3027
Telephone: (713) 751-0400
Fascimile: (713) 751-0906
UNIT
ED
1
S
Case 5:13-cv-03847-EJD Document 59 Filed 02/06/16 Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
VINCENT FERRANTI, individually and
on behalf of all other similarly situated,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
Plaintiff,
Case No. 5:13-cv-03847 EJD
NOTICE AND STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
v.
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO.,
Defendant.
Action Filed: August 20, 2013
Trial Date:
Not set
Case 5:13-cv-03847-EJD Document 59 Filed 02/06/16 Page 2 of 2
1
2
TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, the Parties hereby stipulate to,
3
4
5
6
and the Plaintiffs thereby, voluntarily dismiss this action with prejudice.
The Clerk shall close this file.
CADDELL & CHAPMAN
/ s / Michael Caddell
7
8
9
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Vincent Ferranti and Carlos Martinho
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher LLP
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
/ s / Timothy W. Loose
Timothy W. Loose
Attorneys for Defendant Hewlett-Packard
Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?