Pfeiffer et al v. Torres Electric, Inc.

Filing 7

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 6 TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR TORRES ELECTRIC, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION TO FILE ITS ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT filed by William T. Barrow. Signed by Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 10/11/13. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2013)

SUE CAMPBELL
Attorney at Law, State Bar Number 98728
2 1155 North First Street, Suite 218
San Jose, California 95 I 12
3 Phone: [phone]
Fax:
(408) 938-l 035
4
Attorney for· Plaintiffs
5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

12

13
14

GERALD PFEIFFER AND WILLIAM T.
BARROW, AS TRUSTEES OF THE
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL \VORKERS LOCAL 332
HEALTH AND WELFARE AND PENSION
TRUST FUNDS, NEBF, JE!F, NECA
SERVICE CHARGE, NECA, DUES
CHECK OFF AND APPRENTICESHIP
TRAINING TRUST FUNDS,

15

CASE NO.: 13-CV-03857 HRL
STIPULATION TO EXTEND THE
TIME FOR TORRES ELECTRIC. INC.,
A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION TO
fiLE ITS ANSWER TO THE
COMPLAINT AND PROPOSED
ORDER

Plaintiffs,

16
vs.

17
18

TORRES ELECTRIC,
Corporation

21

22

----------------f.----

Agreement Violation of E.R.I.S.A. (hereinafter "the Complaint") against Defendant TORRES
ELECTRIC, INC., A California Corporation (hcreinaller "TORRES") on August 20,2013.
WHEREAS, TORRES was served with the Complaint on August 27,2013.

24

WHEREAS, TORRES is not currently represented by counsel.

25

WHEREAS, Plaintiff:~ and Defendant TORRES have agreed to allow TORRES until
November 1, 2013 to file its answer to the Complaint.

27

Ill

28
Lnw Office ofSu('
CmupheH
1155 .'i. Jiir:;t Sc,

Sl!PIH.AIION AND PROPOSED ORDER

Sll'· lli:l

No.

San JOSl', C,\ 9$ ill

{
___ )

WHEREAS, Plaintifts filed the Complaint tor Money on Breach of Collective Bargaining

23

26

Calitornial

Defendant(s).

19

20

INC., A

Therefore, it is hereby stipulated by and between the Parties, subject to the Court's

2 approval,that:

1.

3

TORRES shall be given until and including November 1, 2013 to 111c an answer
or other response to the Complaint;

4
2.

5

All other deadlines not spccitically referenced herein, remain unclwngcd.

6

7

Dated this '( •'(

day of September 2013

n L;\,~rfJ
-~- ~
~-

8

sOEc~PBELL ---~·-----

9

Attorney tor Plaintiffs

10
II

)

·TOR~fC:, INC':~ KC:alilonita Corporation

12
13
14

15

ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of Plaintiffs and Defendant TORRES ELECTRIC, INC., A

16

17

CaliforniaCcnvoration, and for good cause appearing,

18

IT IS SO ORDERED that the time for Defendant TORRES ELECTRIC, INC., A

19

California Cmvoration to file its answer to the complaint is extended to and including November

20

I, 20 l3.

21

22

October
Dated; --~ 11, 2013

23

MAGISTRATE JUDUE OF!'HFUS:-DTSTEICTTOTJ.Rr
HOWARD R. LLOYD

24
25

26
27

28
L:m Orfic(' of Sue

2

C;unphdl

1155 :\. Fint St,

STII'! ILA!ION AND PROPOSED ORDEH

Stc. 218

N''·

Snn .Jmc, C\ QSII2