Dela Cruz et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
7
ORDER That Case Be Reassigned to a District Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 9/25/2013. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/25/2013)
1
*E-FILED: September 25, 2013*
2
3
4
5
6
7
NOT FOR CITATION
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
EFREN DELA CRUZ, an individual;
EVELYN DELA CRUZ, an individual,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Case No. 5:13-cv-04136 HRL
ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED
TO A DISTRICT JUDGE
v.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK, FA;
WAMU ACCEPTANCE CORP.; BANK OF
AMERICA, N.A., as Trustee for WaMu
Asset-Backed Certificates, WaMu Series
2007-OA6; CALIFORNIA
RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; and DOES
1 through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
On September 13, 2013, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Civil Local
20
Rule 73-1, all parties were required to file, no later than September 23, 2013, either (1) a Consent
21
to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a
22
Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Despite
23
reminders from the court, not all parties have done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the
24
Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a District Judge. 28 U.S.C. ยง 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1.
25
Dated: September 25, 2013
26
27
28
______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
5:13-cv-04136-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Andrew Michael Purdy
apurdy@morganlewis.com
3
4
5:13-cv-04136-HRL Notice sent by U.S. Mail to:
5
Efren Dela Cruz
3217 Poltonhall Court
San Jose, CA 95121
6
7
8
9
Evelyn Dela Cruz
3217 Poltonhall court
San Jose, CA 95121
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?