Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Millennial Media, Inc.

Filing 128

ORDER to show cause re consolidation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,

13

Plaintiff,

14

v.

15

SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION,
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS
COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM
L.P., SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC.,

16
17

20

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
CONSOLIATION

Defendants.

18
19

Case Nos. C-13-04513 RMW, C-13-04201 DJ, C13-04202 SI, C-13-04203 MMC, C-13-04204 SI,
C-13-04205 WHO, C-13-04206 EJD, C-13-04207
JSW, C-13-03587 DMR

v.
APPLE, INC.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204,
C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587

-1-

1
2

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

3
4
5

v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendants.

6
7
8

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

v.

11

FOURSQUARE LABS, INC.,

12

Defendants.

13
14

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,

15

Plaintiff,

16

v.

17

GROUPON, INC.,

18

Defendants.

19
20

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,

21
22
23
24

Plaintiff,
v.
LIVINGSOCIAL, INC.,
Defendants.

25
26
27
28
OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204,
C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587

-2-

1
2

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

3
4
5

v.
TWITTER, INC.,
Defendants.

6
7
8

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,
Plaintiff,

9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

v.

11

YELP, INC.,
Defendants.

12
13
14

EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE,
LLC,

15

Plaintiff,

16

v.

17

MILLENIAL MEDIA, INC.,

18

Defendants.

19
20

It appears to the court that the above nine Evolutionary Intelligence cases all involve the

21

same two patents and that efficiency and judicial economy suggest that the cases should be

22

consolidated for all pretrial proceedings through claim construction. Therefore, it is hereby ordered

23

that the parties show cause as to why the cases should not be consolidated for pretrial proceedings

24

through claim construction. The parties may file a stipulation for such consolidation and avoid the

25

need to appear, or, if any party opposes such consolidation, it must file a statement not to exceed 5

26

pages in length no later than Wednesday, July 2, 2014 and appear for a hearing at 9 a.m. on July 11,

27

2014.

28
OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204,
C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587

-3-

1
2

Dated: June 23, 2014

_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204,
C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587

-4-