Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC

Filing 224

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL by Magistrate Judge Paul Singh Grewal denying 192 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/16/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

MATTHEW ENTERPRISE, INC.,
Plaintiff,

8

10

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

12

15
16
17
18
19

(Re: Docket No. 192)

CHRYSLER GROUP LLC,

11

14

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

v.

9

13

Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF

Before the court is a motion to seal by Defendant Chrysler Group LLC.1 Each document
that Chrysler seeks to seal was designated as confidential by Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc.2
Where a party seeks to seal documents that its opponent has designated as confidential, “the
Submitting Party’s declaration in support of the Administrative Motion to File Under Seal must
identify the document or portions thereof which contain the designated confidential material.”3
Within four days, the party designating material as sealable—here, MEI—then “must file a
declaration as required by subsection 79-5(d)(1)(A) establishing that all of the designated material
is sealable.”4 MEI has not filed such a declaration. The motion to seal therefore is DENIED.

20
21
22
23
1

See Docket No. 192.

2

See Docket No. 192-1 at ¶¶ 2-3.

3

Civ. L.R. 79-5(e).

4

Civ. L.R. 79-5(e)(1).

24
25
26
27
28

1
Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL

1

SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: May 16, 2016
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No. 13-cv-04236-BLF
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL