Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING 25 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS filed by Matthew Enterprise, Inc., Chrysler Group LLC. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Dismiss : Response due by 12/13/2013, The response shall not exceed 30 pages of text. Replies due by 1/10/2014. The reply shall not exceed 20 pages of text. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/21/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)

Download PDF
7 9 10 11 RT 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 d w a rd J u d ge E ER N Attorneys for Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc. D IS T IC T R a OF C 11/21/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, a Delaware limited ) ) liability company, ) ) ) Defendant. ) MATHEW ENTERPRISE, INC., a California Corporation, Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS FOR RESPONSE AND REPLY TO CHRYSLER GROUP’S MOTION TO DISMISS 27 28 J . D av i l H 13 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 12 Paul Norman, Esq., admitted pro hac vice Boardman & Clark, LLP 1 S Pinkney St., Ste. 410 Madison, WI 53703-4256 Tel: (608) 257-9521 Fax: (608) 283-1709 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 8 Ali Kamarei, State Bar No. 175977 Katja M. Grasso, State Bar No. 266935 Inhouse Counsel 50 W. San Fernando Street, Ste. 900 San Jose, CA 95113 Tel: (408) 918-5393 Fax: (408) 918-5373 R NIA 6 FO 5 LI 4 A 3 S 2 Michael J. Flanagan, State Bar No. 093772 Gavin Hughes, State Bar No. 242119 Law Offices of Michael J. Flanagan 2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 450 Sacramento, CA 95825 Tel: (916) 646-9100 Fax: (916) 646-9138 UNIT ED 1 1 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG 1 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc. (“Mathew Enterprise”) and 3 Defendant Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”), by and through their respective counsels, hereby stipulate 4 5 and agree to an extension of time and page limits for Mathew Enterprise to respond to Chrysler’s Motion to Dismiss filed November 12, 2013 (dkt. #23) and for Chrysler to reply to Mathew Enterprise’s 6 7 8 response, as follows:  9 10 Mathew Enterprise’s response shall be due on December 13, 2013. The response shall not exceed 30 pages of text.  Chrysler’s reply shall be due on January 10, 2014. The reply shall not exceed 20 pages 11 12 of text. 13 This stipulation does not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order. 14 Dated: November 18, 2013 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Counsel for Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc. Counsel for Defendant Chrysler Group LLP /s/ Paul R. Norman____________ Michael J. Flanagan, SBN 093772 Gavin Hughes, SBN 242119 LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. FLANAGAN 2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 450 Sacramento, CA 95825 T: (916) 646-9100 F: (916) 646-9138 /s/ Colin R. Kass (by permission) ___ Colin R. Kass, admitted pro hac vice Scott M. Abeles, admitted pro hac vice Sally M. Handmaker, SBN 281186 PROSKAUER ROSE LLP 1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. Washington, DC 20004 T: (202) 416-6800 F: (202) 416-6900 Ali Kamari, SBN 175977 Katja M. Grasso, SBN 266935 INHOUSE COUNSEL 50 W. San Fernando St., Suite. 900 San Jose, CA 95113 T: (408) 918-5393 Robert E. Davies, SBN 106810 Mary A. Stewart, SBN 106758 Gregory A. Nelson, SBN 274926 DONAHUE DAVIES LLP P.O. Box 277010 2 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG 1 F: (408) 918-5373 5 Paul Norman, admitted pro hac vice BOARDMAN & CLARK, LLP 1 S. Pinkney St., Suite 410 Madison, WI 53703 T: (608) 257-9521 F: (608) 283-1709 6 Sacramento, CA 95827-7010 T: (916) 817-2900 F: (916) 817-2644 Attorneys for Plaintiff 2 3 4 Attorneys for Defendant 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?