Matthew Enterprise, Inc. v. Chrysler Group LLC
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING 25 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS filed by Matthew Enterprise, Inc., Chrysler Group LLC. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 23 MOTION to Dismiss : Response due by 12/13/2013, The response shall not exceed 30 pages of text. Replies due by 1/10/2014. The reply shall not exceed 20 pages of text. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/21/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2013)
7
9
10
11
RT
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
d w a rd
J u d ge E
ER
N
Attorneys for Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc.
D IS T IC T
R
a
OF
C
11/21/2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CHRYSLER GROUP LLC, a Delaware limited )
)
liability company,
)
)
)
Defendant.
)
MATHEW ENTERPRISE, INC., a California
Corporation,
Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME AND PAGE LIMITS FOR
RESPONSE AND REPLY TO CHRYSLER
GROUP’S MOTION TO DISMISS
27
28
J . D av i l
H
13
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
12
Paul Norman, Esq., admitted pro hac vice
Boardman & Clark, LLP
1 S Pinkney St., Ste. 410
Madison, WI 53703-4256
Tel: (608) 257-9521
Fax: (608) 283-1709
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
8
Ali Kamarei, State Bar No. 175977
Katja M. Grasso, State Bar No. 266935
Inhouse Counsel
50 W. San Fernando Street, Ste. 900
San Jose, CA 95113
Tel: (408) 918-5393
Fax: (408) 918-5373
R NIA
6
FO
5
LI
4
A
3
S
2
Michael J. Flanagan, State Bar No. 093772
Gavin Hughes, State Bar No. 242119
Law Offices of Michael J. Flanagan
2277 Fair Oaks Boulevard, Suite 450
Sacramento, CA 95825
Tel: (916) 646-9100
Fax: (916) 646-9138
UNIT
ED
1
1
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG
1
2
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Mathew Enterprise, Inc. (“Mathew Enterprise”) and
3
Defendant Chrysler Group LLC (“Chrysler”), by and through their respective counsels, hereby stipulate
4
5
and agree to an extension of time and page limits for Mathew Enterprise to respond to Chrysler’s
Motion to Dismiss filed November 12, 2013 (dkt. #23) and for Chrysler to reply to Mathew Enterprise’s
6
7
8
response, as follows:
9
10
Mathew Enterprise’s response shall be due on December 13, 2013. The response shall
not exceed 30 pages of text.
Chrysler’s reply shall be due on January 10, 2014. The reply shall not exceed 20 pages
11
12
of text.
13
This stipulation does not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order.
14
Dated: November 18, 2013
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Counsel for Plaintiff
Mathew Enterprise, Inc.
Counsel for Defendant
Chrysler Group LLP
/s/ Paul R. Norman____________
Michael J. Flanagan, SBN 093772
Gavin Hughes, SBN 242119
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL J. FLANAGAN
2277 Fair Oaks Blvd., Suite 450
Sacramento, CA 95825
T: (916) 646-9100
F: (916) 646-9138
/s/ Colin R. Kass (by permission) ___
Colin R. Kass, admitted pro hac vice
Scott M. Abeles, admitted pro hac vice
Sally M. Handmaker, SBN 281186
PROSKAUER ROSE LLP
1001 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20004
T: (202) 416-6800
F: (202) 416-6900
Ali Kamari, SBN 175977
Katja M. Grasso, SBN 266935
INHOUSE COUNSEL
50 W. San Fernando St., Suite. 900
San Jose, CA 95113
T: (408) 918-5393
Robert E. Davies, SBN 106810
Mary A. Stewart, SBN 106758
Gregory A. Nelson, SBN 274926
DONAHUE DAVIES LLP
P.O. Box 277010
2
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG
1
F: (408) 918-5373
5
Paul Norman, admitted pro hac vice
BOARDMAN & CLARK, LLP
1 S. Pinkney St., Suite 410
Madison, WI 53703
T: (608) 257-9521
F: (608) 283-1709
6
Sacramento, CA 95827-7010
T: (916) 817-2900
F: (916) 817-2644
Attorneys for Plaintiff
2
3
4
Attorneys for Defendant
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND PAGE LIMITS
Case No. 5:13-cv-04236-EJD PSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?