Khuc v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 18

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/17/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 12 13 14 15 16 17 LUAN PHAM AHN KHUC, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Case No.: 13-CV-04238-LHK ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On September 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint. ECF No. Defendant filed an answer on February 24, 2014. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to this Court’s social security procedural order, ECF No. 2, Plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment or a motion for remand within twenty eight days after the answer was served. The answer was served on February 24, 2014. ECF No. 16. Plaintiff failed to file his motion within the time frame required. On April 9, 2014, Plaintiff was thus ordered to show cause by April 16, 2014 why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 17. The Plaintiff was informed that if no response was filed by April 16, 2014, this case would be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. No response has been filed as of April 17, 2014. Accordingly, this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The clerk shall close the case file. 1 Case No.: 13-CV-04238 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 Dated: April 17, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 13-CV-04238 ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?