Khuc v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Lucy Koh on 4/17/2014. (lhklc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
13
14
15
16
17
LUAN PHAM AHN KHUC,
Plaintiff,
v.
COMMISSION OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
Defendant.
Case No.: 13-CV-04238-LHK
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On September 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint. ECF No. Defendant filed an answer on
February 24, 2014. ECF No. 14. Pursuant to this Court’s social security procedural order, ECF No.
2, Plaintiff was required to file a motion for summary judgment or a motion for remand within
twenty eight days after the answer was served. The answer was served on February 24, 2014. ECF
No. 16. Plaintiff failed to file his motion within the time frame required.
On April 9, 2014, Plaintiff was thus ordered to show cause by April 16, 2014 why this case
should not be dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 17. The Plaintiff was
informed that if no response was filed by April 16, 2014, this case would be dismissed with
prejudice for failure to prosecute. No response has been filed as of April 17, 2014. Accordingly,
this case is dismissed with prejudice for failure to prosecute. The clerk shall close the case file.
1
Case No.: 13-CV-04238
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: April 17, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 13-CV-04238
ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?