Sanchez v. Usman et al
Filing
21
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case dismissed with prejudice. For a period of 90 days from the date of this order, court to retain jurisdiction to enforce settlement. Clerk shall close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 6/17/2014. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
FRANCISCO SANCHEZ,
Case No. 5:13-cv-04292 HRL
Plaintiff,
13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
14
16
MOHAMMAD USMAN dba NAIMAT
KADAH INTERNATIONAL, INC.;
NAIMAT KADAHA INTERNATIONAL,
INC.; KABOB & CURRY’S,
17
Defendants.
15
18
At the June 3, 2014 show cause hearing, the parties advised that they have settled this
19
matter and requested that this court retain jurisdiction to enforce their settlement. Accordingly,
20
this matter is dismissed with prejudice. For a period of 90 days from the date of this order, the
21
court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ settlement. The clerk shall close this file.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 17, 2014
______________________________________
HOWARD R. LLOYD
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
2
5:13-cv-04292-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
Gregory Scott Redmond
gsrlaw@comcast.net
3
James Dal Bon
jdblaw@earthlink.net, jdb@wagedefenders.com, mh@wagedefenders.com
4
5
Tyler Mark Paetkau tpaetkau@hslawoffice.com, liliane@hslawoffice.com,
osavage@hslawoffice.com, smith@hslawoffice.com
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?