Perkins et al v. LinkedIn Corporation

Filing 99

ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/16/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 PAUL PERKINS et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL v. LINKEDIN CORPORATION, Defendant. 17 18 On June 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their motion for preliminary approval of class action 19 settlement. ECF No. 95. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the case management 20 conferences set for June 17, June 24, July 1, July 8, and July 15, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The Court 21 also VACATES the class certification briefing schedule and the August 27, 2015 hearing date on 22 class certification. A hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of class action 23 settlement shall be held on August 27, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. The case schedule otherwise remains as 24 set. See ECF No. 93. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 1 Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL 1 2 3 Dated: June 16, 2015 ______________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?