Perkins et al v. LinkedIn Corporation
Filing
99
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/16/2015. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
PAUL PERKINS et al.,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK
ORDER VACATING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES,
VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND
HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING
ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL
v.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION,
Defendant.
17
18
On June 11, 2015, Plaintiffs filed their motion for preliminary approval of class action
19
settlement. ECF No. 95. Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES the case management
20
conferences set for June 17, June 24, July 1, July 8, and July 15, 2015, at 2:00 p.m. The Court
21
also VACATES the class certification briefing schedule and the August 27, 2015 hearing date on
22
class certification. A hearing on Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary approval of class action
23
settlement shall be held on August 27, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. The case schedule otherwise remains as
24
set. See ECF No. 93.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
28
1
Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL
1
2
3
Dated: June 16, 2015
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No. 13-CV-04303-LHK
ORDER VACATING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES, VACATING CLASS CERTIFICATION
BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING, AND SETTING HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?