The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Chi-yi et al

Filing 28

ORDER GRANTING 27 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complain filed by Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yu-sang, Chiang Yo-chang, Chiang Yo-ching, Chiang Fang Chi-yi, Chiang Yo-bo, Chiang Tsai Hui-mei. Response due 4/14/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/5/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 VENABLE LLP Ben Whitwell(SBN 138426) bwhitwell@venable.com Taman Vinson Bentz(SBN 258600) tbentz venable.com 2049 entury Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310)229-9900 Facsimile: (310)229-9901 Attorneys for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chian~g Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yo-Ching 9 10 0 11 N W a F' n ~ o a ~ ~ 0 a Qo w W` -'m '~ ~ ~~' YW N a J N 13 14 `i ~ ¢ ~ Z m FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 a ~ o W ~ ~, ~Zo W UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CASE NO.: 13:cv-04383-EJD THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNNERSITY, CHonorable Edward J. Davila Courtroom 2] 4 15 Plaintiff, l~ STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT N 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CHIANG FANG CHI-YI, an individual; CHIANG YO-MEI, an individual; CHIANG HSIAO-CHANG, an individual; CHIANG TSAI HLJI-MEI, an individual; CHIANG YL7-SLING, an individual; CHIANG YO-LAN, an individual; CHIANG YO-BO, an individual; CHIANG YO-CHANG,an individual; CHIANG YO-CHING, CIIUNGYAN CHAN,an individual 25 26 Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD 1 WHEREAS the Complaint in the above-entitled action was filed on 2 September 20, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 3 California; 4 WHEREAS,on January 14, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendants Chiang Fang- 5 Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang Yo-bo with the Complaint via electronic mail 6 pursuant to the Court's order of January 14, 2014; 7 WHEREAS,Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang 8 Yo-bo's (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Served Defendants") response to 9 the Complaint is currently due on February 4, 2014; 10 0 0 WI~REAS,Defendants Chian Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo- 11 Chang and Chiang Yo-Ching (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Waiver 12 Defendants") agreed to waive service of the Complaint; N W ~~~ ~~ ag 0 o a ~ m 13 WHEREAS,the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants are represented Q ¢ m W w v m ►a ~ v~ °~ Y W N 14 Zi ~Q"' 15 Q J N d ~ O woo Z J U 0 N 16 by the same counsel; WHEREAS,Plaintiff agrees that the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants should respond to the Complaint on the same day, April 14, 2014; 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,PURSUANT TO LOCAL 18 RULE 6-1, that Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang Yo- 19 bo's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint in the above- 20 captioned matter is extended until April 14, 2014; 21 IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED,that Defendants Chian 22 Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo-Chang and Chiang Yo-Ching have 23 waived service and will also respond to the Complaint on April 14, 2014. 24 Dated: February 3, 2014 VENABLE LLP 25 26 27 By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Ben D. Whitwell Tamany Vinson Bentz 28 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD Attorneys for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yochang; Chiang Yo-ching 1 2 3 4 5 Dated: February 3 ,2014 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP 6 7 By: /s/ Mark Davis Litvack Mark Davis Litvack James Chang Attorneys for Plaintiff The Board of Trustees ofthe Leland Stanford Junior University 8 9 10 0 a 11 N w I a '_ o ~~ ag 0 a W Qa W U ''Y~°' w' ~ W Q J 13 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION m N N 14 a ~ o ~- ~ Q m w~~ ~Zo ~J I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 15 the foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 16 ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT. In compliance with N 1 / the General Order, I hereby attest that the other signatories to this filing have 18 concurred in this filing. 19 20 By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Attorney for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yoching ~ Dated: February 3, 2014 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 3rd day of February, 2014, a copy ofthe 4 foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 5 ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO COMPLAINT was served via 6 CM/ECF 7 8 9 10 0 0 W ~~~ 11 N 12 ~~ ag 0 o a ~¢o ~ °' (7~ w U m aY~m W m v Attorneysfor'Plaintiff The Board of Trustees ofthe Leland Stanford Junior University 13 ~°-;o 14 z~Q" 15 W F ~, ~ Zo ~ W Q J Mark Davis Litvacic James Chang Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406 N N J 16 N 1 18 By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Attorney for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Huimei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yo-Ching 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?