The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Chi-yi et al
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yu-sang, Chiang Yo-chang, Chiang Yo-ching, Chiang Fang Chi-yi, Chiang Yo-bo, Chiang Tsai Hui-mei. Response due 4/14/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/20/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2014)
RT
8
NO
7
Attorneys for Defendants
Chiang Fang Chi-y~i~; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei• Chiang
Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; ~hiang
Yo-Chang; Chiang Yo-thing
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
dw
J u d ge E
avila
9
10
11
0
N
W
~ r
~ ~
13
W w ~ m
aY~~
N
N
14
a ~ o
z ~a "'
woo
0
F
D IS T IC T O
R
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
C
3/20/2014
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NO.: 13:cv-04383-EJD
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR
UNIVERSITY,
[Honorable Edward J. Davila
4
Courtroom 2]
15
Z J
U
N
1~
0
aN~
a ¢ °'
~ Qo
d' W
Q J
A
H
ER
a rd J . D
R NIA
6
RT
U
O
5
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T
FO
4
LI
3
S
2
VENABLE LLP
Ben Whitwell(SBN 138426)
bwhitwell@venable.com
Taman Vinson Bentz(SBN 258600)
tbentz venable.com
2049 entury Park East, Suite 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: (310)229-9900
Facsimile: (310) 229-9901
UNIT
ED
1
STIPULATION TO EXTEND
TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE
RESPOND TO AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Plaintiff,
16
N
17
vs.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
CHIANG FANG CHI-YI, an individual;
CHIANG YO-MEI, an individual;
CHIANG HSIAO-CHANG, an individual;
CHIANG TSAI HLTI-MEI, an individual;
CHIANG YLT-SLING, an individual;
CHIANG YO-LAN, an individual;
CHIANG YO-BO, an individual;
CHIANG YO-CHANG,an individual;
CHIANG YO-CHING, CHLINGYAN
CHAN,an individual
25
m
Defendants.
27
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD
1
WHEREAS the Complaint in the above-entitled action was filed on
2
September 20, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
3
California;
4
WHEREAS,on January 14, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendants Chiang Fang-
5
Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang Yo-bo with the Complaint via electronic mail
6
pursuant to the Court's order of January 14, 2014;
7
WHEREAS,Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang
8
Yo-bo's (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Served Defendants") response to
9
the Complaint was due on February 4, 2014;
10
0
0
N
W
a '_
~~
0
a~~
a ~Qo
~ °'
w ` °'
W" m
,~Y~~
~ W N
Q J N
a. ~ O
11
Chang and Chiang Yo-Ching (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Waiver
12
Defendants") agreed to waive service of the Complaint;
13
14
Z ~¢`"
w~a
Z J
U
0
N
WHEREAS,Defendants Chian Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo-
15
WHEREAS,the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants are represented
by the same counsel;
WHEREAS,Plaintiff and Defendants previously filed a Stipulation To
16
Extend Time For Defendants To Answer or Otherwise Respond To Complaint on
17
February 3, 2014. With the stipulated extension, the Served Defendants and
18
Waiver Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was
19
extended until April 14, 2014;
20
WHEREAS,Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on March 7, 2014;
21
WHEREAS,the deadline for the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants
22
to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is March 28, 2014;
23
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,PURSUANT TO LOCAL
24
RULE 6-1, that the deadline for Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung,
25
Chiang Yo-bo, Chiang Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo-Chang and
26
Chiang Yo-Ching to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is
27
extended until April 14, 2014.
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD
1
I Dated: March 20, 2014
2
VENABLE LLP
By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz
Ben D. Whitwell
Tamany Vinson Bentz
3
4
Attorneys for Defendants
Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai
Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang
Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yochang; Chiang Yo-ching
5
6
7
8
9
~ Dated: March 20, 2014
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW
PITTMAN LLP
to
a
a
11
N
W
a ~- ~a 0
12
a
13
Qo
w W`-'~
~ W N
aY ~~'
Q J N
14
d ~ O
z ~ Q `°
W ~ ~,
~Zo
a
N
15
By: /s/ Marlc Davis Litvack
Marls Davis Litvacic
James Chang
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The Board of Trustees of the Leland
Stanford Junior University
16
1 /
O
2~
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD
1
2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file
3
the foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
4
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. In
5
compliance with the General Order, I hereby attest that the other signatories to this
6
filing have concurred in this filing.
7
8
By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz
Tamany Vinson Bentz
Attorney for Defendants
Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang
Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung;
Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo;
Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yoching
Dated: March 20, 2014
9
10
0
0
11
N
W
~~~
~ ~
12
a ao
w W"~
13
W
'~ ~ ~~'
YJ N
Q
N
14
~ O
O
a ~ o
Zi ~ Q m
w~N
W J
~ Zo
m
v
0
15
16
N
1 /
O
1~
2~
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
~!,
I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 20th day of March, 2014, a copy of the
4
foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO
5
ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT was
6
i served via CM/ECF:
7
8
9
10
0
0
11
w
a ~~
~~
12
Mark Davis Litvacic
James Chang
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406
aN 0
a
a~¢ o
w
W ¢ U
Attorneysfog Plaintiff The Board of Trustees
ofthe Leland Stanford Junior University
13
m
'~ ~ ~ ' 14
Y W N
~' a J °
N
a ~ o
Zi ~ Q ~
W ~ ~
~Zo
W
IS
m
16
N
17
18
By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz
Attorney for Defendants
Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Huimei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan;
Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang;
Chiang Yo-Ching
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STII'ULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?