The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. Chi-yi et al

Filing 31

ORDER GRANTING 30 Stipulation to Extend Time for Defendants to Answer or Otherwise Respond filed by Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yu-sang, Chiang Yo-chang, Chiang Yo-ching, Chiang Fang Chi-yi, Chiang Yo-bo, Chiang Tsai Hui-mei. Response due 4/14/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/20/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2014)

Download PDF
RT 8 NO 7 Attorneys for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-y~i~; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei• Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; ~hiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yo-thing D RDERE OO IT IS S dw J u d ge E avila 9 10 11 0 N W ~ r ~ ~ 13 W w ~ m aY~~ N N 14 a ~ o z ~a "' woo 0 F D IS T IC T O R UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT C 3/20/2014 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 13:cv-04383-EJD THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, [Honorable Edward J. Davila 4 Courtroom 2] 15 Z J U N 1~ 0 aN~ a ¢ °' ~ Qo d' W Q J A H ER a rd J . D R NIA 6 RT U O 5 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T FO 4 LI 3 S 2 VENABLE LLP Ben Whitwell(SBN 138426) bwhitwell@venable.com Taman Vinson Bentz(SBN 258600) tbentz venable.com 2049 entury Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: (310)229-9900 Facsimile: (310) 229-9901 UNIT ED 1 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff, 16 N 17 vs. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 CHIANG FANG CHI-YI, an individual; CHIANG YO-MEI, an individual; CHIANG HSIAO-CHANG, an individual; CHIANG TSAI HLTI-MEI, an individual; CHIANG YLT-SLING, an individual; CHIANG YO-LAN, an individual; CHIANG YO-BO, an individual; CHIANG YO-CHANG,an individual; CHIANG YO-CHING, CHLINGYAN CHAN,an individual 25 m Defendants. 27 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD 1 WHEREAS the Complaint in the above-entitled action was filed on 2 September 20, 2013 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of 3 California; 4 WHEREAS,on January 14, 2014, Plaintiff served Defendants Chiang Fang- 5 Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang Yo-bo with the Complaint via electronic mail 6 pursuant to the Court's order of January 14, 2014; 7 WHEREAS,Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung and Chiang 8 Yo-bo's (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Served Defendants") response to 9 the Complaint was due on February 4, 2014; 10 0 0 N W a '_ ~~ 0 a~~ a ~Qo ~ °' w ` °' W" m ,~Y~~ ~ W N Q J N a. ~ O 11 Chang and Chiang Yo-Ching (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Waiver 12 Defendants") agreed to waive service of the Complaint; 13 14 Z ~¢`" w~a Z J U 0 N WHEREAS,Defendants Chian Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo- 15 WHEREAS,the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants are represented by the same counsel; WHEREAS,Plaintiff and Defendants previously filed a Stipulation To 16 Extend Time For Defendants To Answer or Otherwise Respond To Complaint on 17 February 3, 2014. With the stipulated extension, the Served Defendants and 18 Waiver Defendants deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint was 19 extended until April 14, 2014; 20 WHEREAS,Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on March 7, 2014; 21 WHEREAS,the deadline for the Served Defendants and Waiver Defendants 22 to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is March 28, 2014; 23 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED,PURSUANT TO LOCAL 24 RULE 6-1, that the deadline for Defendants Chiang Fang-Chiyi, Chiang Yo-sung, 25 Chiang Yo-bo, Chiang Tsai Hui-mei, Chiang Yo-lan, Chiang Yo-Chang and 26 Chiang Yo-Ching to answer or otherwise respond to the Amended Complaint is 27 extended until April 14, 2014. 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD 1 I Dated: March 20, 2014 2 VENABLE LLP By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Ben D. Whitwell Tamany Vinson Bentz 3 4 Attorneys for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yochang; Chiang Yo-ching 5 6 7 8 9 ~ Dated: March 20, 2014 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP to a a 11 N W a ~- ~a 0 12 a 13 Qo w W`-'~ ~ W N aY ~~' Q J N 14 d ~ O z ~ Q `° W ~ ~, ~Zo a N 15 By: /s/ Marlc Davis Litvack Marls Davis Litvacic James Chang Attorneys for Plaintiff The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University 16 1 / O 2~ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file 3 the foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 4 ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT. In 5 compliance with the General Order, I hereby attest that the other signatories to this 6 filing have concurred in this filing. 7 8 By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Tamany Vinson Bentz Attorney for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Hui-mei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yoching Dated: March 20, 2014 9 10 0 0 11 N W ~~~ ~ ~ 12 a ao w W"~ 13 W '~ ~ ~~' YJ N Q N 14 ~ O O a ~ o Zi ~ Q m w~N W J ~ Zo m v 0 15 16 N 1 / O 1~ 2~ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 3 ~!, I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this 20th day of March, 2014, a copy of the 4 foregoing STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO 5 ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT was 6 i served via CM/ECF: 7 8 9 10 0 0 11 w a ~~ ~~ 12 Mark Davis Litvacic James Chang Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP 725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406 aN 0 a a~¢ o w W ¢ U Attorneysfog Plaintiff The Board of Trustees ofthe Leland Stanford Junior University 13 m '~ ~ ~ ' 14 Y W N ~' a J ° N a ~ o Zi ~ Q ~ W ~ ~ ~Zo W IS m 16 N 17 18 By: /s/ Tamany Vinson Bentz Attorney for Defendants Chiang Fang Chi-yi; Chiang Tsai Huimei; Chiang Yu-sung; Chiang Yo-lan; Chiang Yo-bo; Chiang Yo-Chang; Chiang Yo-Ching 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STII'ULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO ANSWER AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No.: 13-cv-04383-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?