Jack in the Box Inc. v. Mehta et al

Filing 271

ORDER GRANTING 270 Status Report filed by Jack in the Box Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/15/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)

Download PDF
S 6 7 8 DATED: 12/15/2015 N R NIA FO . D av i l a LI ER w a rd J u d ge E d A J H 5 RT 4 DERED O OR IT IS S NO 3 UNIT ED 2 LECLAIRRYAN Robert S. McWhorter (CA 226186) robert.mcwhorter@leclairryan.com Kevin T. Collins (CA 185427) Kevin.collins@leclairryan.com 980 9th Street, 16th Floor Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: 916.449.9690 Facsimile: 916.449.9694 RT U O 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA F D IS T IC T O R C Attorneys for Plaintiff JACK IN THE BOX INC., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as Foodmaker, Inc. 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 JACK IN THE BOX INC., a Delaware corporation, formerly known as Foodmaker, Inc., 16 17 18 19 20 21 Plaintiff, vs. DEEPAK MEHTA, an individual; KIRAN MEHTA, an individual; MEHTA ENTERPRISES, INC., a suspended California corporation; DEEPAK ENTERPRISES INC., a California corporation, Case No: 5:13-cv-04444-EJD FIFTH STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE Defendants. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD 1 Plaintiff, Jack in the Box Inc., provides this Status Report regarding the Order Granting 2 Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Turnover Order and Approve Private Foreclosure Sale (the 3 “Order”)(Docket Item 116). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the 4 meaning ascribed to those terms in the Order. 5 On May 19, 2014, the Court entered the Order approving and authorizing a private 6 foreclosure sale (the “Sale”) of the GECB Collateral by GECB to Plaintiff pursuant to the terms 7 of the APA. The APA conditioned the closing of the Sale upon Plaintiff’s satisfactory 8 completion of a due diligence review and additionally contemplated a closing on or before 9 October 1, 2014. Due to unanticipated developments in this case, Closing has not occurred and 10 Plaintiff and GECB have agreed to extend the Outside Date for Closing on more than one 11 occasion. 12 with the Court. Plaintiff has notified the Court of such amendments by filing prior Status Reports 13 On August 28, 2015, this Court entered its Order vacating all pretrial dates, discovery 14 cutoff dates, expert disclosures and trial dates pending the Court’s ruling on Jack in the Box, 15 Inc.’s Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 266). Pending the Court’s ruling on the 16 Summary Judgment Motion, Jack in the Box has not committed the substantial resources 17 required to complete both its diligence review and a closing of the Sale. Accordingly, as 18 permitted by the APA approved by the Court, Plaintiff and GECB have again agreed to extend 19 the Outside Closing Date, as defined in the APA, to January 31, 2016. JIB retains the right to 20 terminate the APA until five calendar days prior to Closing. Plaintiff has again agreed to make 21 monthly payments, retroactive to August, 2014, to GECB in the amount of $50,000 (the “Interim 22 Payments”) until the earlier of July 31, 2015 or the actual Closing. The Interim Payments will 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE 4844-9655-1711.1 Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD 1 reduce the principal obligation owing from the Defendants to GECB and will reduce the 2 Purchase Price. 3 4 Dated: December 9, 2015 5 LECLAIRRYAN By: 6 /s/ Robert S. McWhorter Robert S. McWhorter Attorneys for Plaintiff JACK IN THE BOX INC. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE 4844-9655-1711.1 Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?