Jack in the Box Inc. v. Mehta et al
Filing
271
ORDER GRANTING 270 Status Report filed by Jack in the Box Inc. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/15/2015. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/15/2015)
S
6
7
8
DATED: 12/15/2015
N
R NIA
FO
. D av i l a
LI
ER
w a rd J
u d ge E d
A
J
H
5
RT
4
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
NO
3
UNIT
ED
2
LECLAIRRYAN
Robert S. McWhorter (CA 226186)
robert.mcwhorter@leclairryan.com
Kevin T. Collins (CA 185427)
Kevin.collins@leclairryan.com
980 9th Street, 16th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: 916.449.9690
Facsimile: 916.449.9694
RT
U
O
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JACK IN THE BOX INC.,
a Delaware corporation, formerly known as Foodmaker, Inc.
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
JACK IN THE BOX INC., a Delaware
corporation, formerly known as Foodmaker,
Inc.,
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
vs.
DEEPAK MEHTA, an individual; KIRAN
MEHTA, an individual; MEHTA
ENTERPRISES, INC., a suspended California
corporation; DEEPAK ENTERPRISES INC.,
a California corporation,
Case No:
5:13-cv-04444-EJD
FIFTH STATUS REPORT REGARDING
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER
ORDER AND APPROVE PRIVATE
FORECLOSURE SALE
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND
APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE
Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD
1
Plaintiff, Jack in the Box Inc., provides this Status Report regarding the Order Granting
2
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Turnover Order and Approve Private Foreclosure Sale (the
3
“Order”)(Docket Item 116). Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the
4
meaning ascribed to those terms in the Order.
5
On May 19, 2014, the Court entered the Order approving and authorizing a private
6
foreclosure sale (the “Sale”) of the GECB Collateral by GECB to Plaintiff pursuant to the terms
7
of the APA. The APA conditioned the closing of the Sale upon Plaintiff’s satisfactory
8
completion of a due diligence review and additionally contemplated a closing on or before
9
October 1, 2014. Due to unanticipated developments in this case, Closing has not occurred and
10
Plaintiff and GECB have agreed to extend the Outside Date for Closing on more than one
11
occasion.
12
with the Court.
Plaintiff has notified the Court of such amendments by filing prior Status Reports
13
On August 28, 2015, this Court entered its Order vacating all pretrial dates, discovery
14
cutoff dates, expert disclosures and trial dates pending the Court’s ruling on Jack in the Box,
15
Inc.’s Summary Judgment Motion (Docket No. 266). Pending the Court’s ruling on the
16
Summary Judgment Motion, Jack in the Box has not committed the substantial resources
17
required to complete both its diligence review and a closing of the Sale. Accordingly, as
18
permitted by the APA approved by the Court, Plaintiff and GECB have again agreed to extend
19
the Outside Closing Date, as defined in the APA, to January 31, 2016. JIB retains the right to
20
terminate the APA until five calendar days prior to Closing. Plaintiff has again agreed to make
21
monthly payments, retroactive to August, 2014, to GECB in the amount of $50,000 (the “Interim
22
Payments”) until the earlier of July 31, 2015 or the actual Closing. The Interim Payments will
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND
APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE
4844-9655-1711.1
Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD
1
reduce the principal obligation owing from the Defendants to GECB and will reduce the
2
Purchase Price.
3
4
Dated: December 9, 2015
5
LECLAIRRYAN
By:
6
/s/ Robert S. McWhorter
Robert S. McWhorter
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JACK IN THE BOX INC.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
JIB’S STATUS REPORT REGARDING ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO AMEND TURNOVER ORDER AND
APPROVE PRIVATE FORECLOSURE SALE
4844-9655-1711.1
Case No. 5:13-CV-04444-EJD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?