Evolutionary Intelligence, LLC v. Sprint Nextel Corporation et al

Filing 143

ORDER to show cause re consolidation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/23/14. (rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/23/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., SPRINT SOLUTIONS INC., 16 17 20 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CONSOLIATION Defendants. 18 19 Case Nos. C-13-04513 RMW, C-13-04201 DJ, C13-04202 SI, C-13-04203 MMC, C-13-04204 SI, C-13-04205 WHO, C-13-04206 EJD, C-13-04207 JSW, C-13-03587 DMR v. APPLE, INC., Defendants. 25 26 27 28 OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204, C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587 -1- 1 2 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, Plaintiff, 3 4 5 v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendants. 6 7 8 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 v. 11 FOURSQUARE LABS, INC., 12 Defendants. 13 14 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 GROUPON, INC., 18 Defendants. 19 20 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, 21 22 23 24 Plaintiff, v. LIVINGSOCIAL, INC., Defendants. 25 26 27 28 OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204, C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587 -2- 1 2 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, Plaintiff, 3 4 5 v. TWITTER, INC., Defendants. 6 7 8 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, Plaintiff, 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 v. 11 YELP, INC., Defendants. 12 13 14 EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, LLC, 15 Plaintiff, 16 v. 17 MILLENIAL MEDIA, INC., 18 Defendants. 19 20 It appears to the court that the above nine Evolutionary Intelligence cases all involve the 21 same two patents and that efficiency and judicial economy suggest that the cases should be 22 consolidated for all pretrial proceedings through claim construction. Therefore, it is hereby ordered 23 that the parties show cause as to why the cases should not be consolidated for pretrial proceedings 24 through claim construction. The parties may file a stipulation for such consolidation and avoid the 25 need to appear, or, if any party opposes such consolidation, it must file a statement not to exceed 5 26 pages in length no later than Wednesday, July 2, 2014 and appear for a hearing at 9 a.m. on July 11, 27 2014. 28 OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204, C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587 -3- 1 2 Dated: June 23, 2014 _________________________________ RONALD M. WHYTE United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OSC RE: CONSOLIDATION, Case Nos. C-1304513, C-13-04201, C-13-04202, C-13-04203, C-13-04204, C-13-04205, C-13-04206, C-13-04207, C-13-03587 -4-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?