Mayhew v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
24
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF; CONSTRUING CORRESONDENCE AS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND VACATING 23 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/31/2014. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
6
JOHN MAYHEW,
Case No. 13-cv-04521-BLF
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
9
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
10
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE
CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED BY
PLAINTIFF; CONSTRUING
CORRESPONDENCE AS PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT; AND VACATING ORDER
TO SHOW CAUSE
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On October 14, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this action should not
13
14
be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Order recited the procedural history of this case,
15
including Plaintiff’s failure to file a motion for summary judgment within the time provided by the
16
Court.
17
The Court has received Plaintiff’s correspondence dated October 28, 2014, in which
18
Plaintiff asks the Court not to dismiss his action and to grant summary judgment in his favor. The
19
Clerk is directed to file this correspondence, which the Court construes as a motion for summary
20
judgment. The Court hereby vacates the Order to Show Cause and grants Plaintiff until November
21
14, 2014 to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any evidence he wishes to submit in
22
support of his motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s time to file her cross-motion for
23
summary judgment shall run from the date upon which Plaintiff files a memorandum of points and
24
authorities or from November 14, 2014, whichever is earlier.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 31, 2014
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?