Mayhew v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 24

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF; CONSTRUING CORRESONDENCE AS PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND VACATING 23 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 10/31/2014. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 6 JOHN MAYHEW, Case No. 13-cv-04521-BLF Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. 10 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO FILE CORRESPONDENCE SUBMITTED BY PLAINTIFF; CONSTRUING CORRESPONDENCE AS PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; AND VACATING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 On October 14, 2014, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this action should not 13 14 be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Order recited the procedural history of this case, 15 including Plaintiff’s failure to file a motion for summary judgment within the time provided by the 16 Court. 17 The Court has received Plaintiff’s correspondence dated October 28, 2014, in which 18 Plaintiff asks the Court not to dismiss his action and to grant summary judgment in his favor. The 19 Clerk is directed to file this correspondence, which the Court construes as a motion for summary 20 judgment. The Court hereby vacates the Order to Show Cause and grants Plaintiff until November 21 14, 2014 to file a memorandum of points and authorities and any evidence he wishes to submit in 22 support of his motion for summary judgment. Defendant’s time to file her cross-motion for 23 summary judgment shall run from the date upon which Plaintiff files a memorandum of points and 24 authorities or from November 14, 2014, whichever is earlier. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 31, 2014 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?