Delphix Corp. v. Actifio, Inc.

Filing 104

Order granting 96 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal. Plaintiff shall file the redacted version of its reply brief into the public record within four (4) days of the date of this order. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 10/17/2014.(blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2014)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7

DELPHIX CORP.,

Case No. 13-cv-04613-BLF

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

ACTIFIO, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL
[Re: ECF 96]

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

Before the Court is plaintiff Delphix Corp.’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal,

14

whereby Plaintiff seeks to seal a portion of its reply brief in support of its Motion to Amend and

15

Supplement Declaratory Judgment Complaint. Admin. Mot., ECF 96. Plaintiff seeks to redact a

16

diagram in the reply brief that “contains competitively sensitive information regarding the design

17

and operation of Delphix’s product.” Decl. of Julia M. Kolibachuk ¶ 4, ECF 96-1. The Court

18

finds pursuant to Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006) that

19

compelling reasons weigh in favor of this modest sealing request, which is narrowly tailored to

20

sealing only the sealable matter.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to File Under Seal is accordingly GRANTED. The
unredacted version of Plaintiff’s reply brief (ECF 96-4) shall remain under seal.
Plaintiff is further ordered to file the redacted version of its reply brief into the public
record within four (4) days of the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 17, 2014
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge