Jimenez et al v. Suntrust Mortgage Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. This case is DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/11/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04615 EJD

MARGARITO JIMENEZ, et. al.,

11

ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Plaintiff(s),

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

v.
SUNTRUST MORTGAGE INC.,

14
Defendant(s).
15
16

/
On February 4, 2014, the court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause by February 10, 2014, why

17

this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with a court order

18

after Plaintiffs failed to submit a case management statement by the deadline imposed by the court.

19

See Docket Item No. 16. The court advised Plaintiffs that this case would be dismissed if they did

20

not file a case management statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause. Id.

21

Plaintiffs have not complied with the show cause order as directed. Accordingly, this case is

22

DISMISSED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment will be entered in favor

23

of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Dated: February 11, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04615 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE