Travelers Property Casualty Company of America v. Kaufman & Broad Monterey Bay, Inc. et al

Filing 77

ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Travelers Property Casualty of America, 54 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Kaufman & Broad Monterey Bay, Inc., KB Home South Bay, Inc., K&B Bakewell Seaside Venture, LLC. The court has reviewed the motions, and finds that both exceed the page limitation provided by this courts Local Rules. Since neither side sought leave to exceed the page limitation in advance of filing, the court notifies the parties that it will not review any material contained in the motions past the 25th page of text. In other words, the court will review the first 25 pages - which may include the notice of motion and prefatory material such as tables of contents and tables of authorities - but nothing more. Any arguments contained in excessive pages will therefore not be considered. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/6/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4

SAN JOSE DIVISION

5
6

TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY OF
AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

7
8

v.

Case No. 5:13-cv-04745 EJD
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 54

9
10

KAUFMAN & BROAD MONTEREY BAY,
INC., et al.,
Defendants.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12

On November 3, 2014, Plaintiff Travelers Property Casualty of America and Defendants

13

Kaufman & Broad Monterey Bay, Inc., K&B Bakewell Seaside Venture, LLC, and KB Home

14

South Bay, Inc. filed cross-motions for summary judgment and partial summary judgment. See

15

Docket Item Nos. 52, 54. The court has reviewed the motions, and finds that both exceed the page

16

limitation provided by this court’s Local Rules. See Civ. L.R. 7-2(b) (requiring that all motions

17

not exceed 25 pages, inclusive of the notice of motion and caption page, a concise statement of

18

what relief is sought, and the memorandum of points and authorities).

19

Since neither side sought leave to exceed the page limitation in advance of filing, the court

20

notifies the parties that it will not review any material contained in the motions past the 25th page

21

of text. In other words, the court will review the first 25 pages - which may include the notice of

22

motion and prefatory material such as tables of contents and tables of authorities - but nothing

23

more. Any arguments contained in excessive pages will therefore not be considered.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 6, 2014
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
1
Case No.: 5:13-cv-04745 EJD
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT