Open Text S.A. v. Box, Inc. et al

Filing 162

ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION. The time for the hearing is rescheduled from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. on 1/24/2014. Please see order for further instructions. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/7/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04910 EJD OPEN TEXT S.A., 11 ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Plaintiff(s), For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 v. BOX, INC., et. al., 14 Defendant(s). 15 16 17 18 / With regard to the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Docket Item No. 64), the court orders as follows: 1. On or before January 13, 2014, the parties shall deliver to the undersigned’s 19 Courtroom Deputy, Elizabeth Garcia, unredacted chambers copies of all pleadings 20 filed for the preliminary injunction motion to date, organized in binders, in a manner 21 which also identifies the docket item number for each pleading. 22 2. any slides or other materials the parties intend to display during the hearing. 23 24 On or before January 20, 2014, the parties shall deliver to Ms. Garcia 10 copies of 3. The time for the hearing is rescheduled from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. on January 24, 25 2014. The hearing shall last no longer than 2 hours, allocated equally between 26 Plaintiff and Defendants. 27 28 4. In their presentations, the parties shall comply with the following limitations: • If construction of claim terms is necessary, the court will construe no more 1 CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04910 EJD ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 1 than 6 collective terms. On or before January 20, 2014, the parties shall file 2 a Joint Preliminary Injunction Statement that lists each term, each party’s 3 proposed construction, and support for each party’s proposed construction 4 side by side, as shown in Attachment A of the undersigned’s Standing Order 5 for Patent Cases. 6 • 7 8 As to any invalidity arguments, Defendants are limited to 10 prior art references, collectively. • Oral argument presented at the hearing should be focused on the issues of (1) likelihood of success on the merits and (2) irreparable injury. Oral argument 10 on the issues of the balance of equities or the public interest is not necessary. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: January 7, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CASE NO. 5:13-cv-04910 EJD ORDER RE: HEARING ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?