Madriz et al v. King City Police Department et al
Filing
101
ORDER DEFERRING RULING on 99 Defendants' Administrative Motion to Assign Case to Court's ADR Program. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file the form entitled "Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference" within 10 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 3/6/2015. (ejdlc4S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/6/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
SAN JOSE DIVISION
7
8
JOSE LUIS MADRIZ, et al.,
Case No. 5:13-cv-05096-EJD
Plaintiffs,
9
v.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
KING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, et
al.,
12
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON
DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO ASSIGN CASE TO
COURT’S ADR PROGRAM
Defendants.
Re: Dkt. No. 99
13
Presently before the court is Defendants County of Monterey, et al.’s (“County of
14
Monterey”) Administrative Motion to Assign Case to Court’s ADR Program. See Dkt. No. 99.
15
County of Monterey seeks a court order referring this case to the court’s ADR program for the
16
purposes of scheduling and conducting a mediation. Id. at 4.
17
Given the circumstances, it is appropriate for the parties to participate in an ADR phone
18
conference to determine the best course of action. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the parties
19
shall file the form entitled “Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference” within 10 days of the
20
date of this Order. After completing the ADR phone conference, the parties shall file a brief
21
report informing the court of their course of action. A ruling on the instant motion is DEFERRED
22
until the parties inform the court of the results of the ADR phone conference.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 6, 2015
______________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
1
Case No.: 5:13-cv-05096-EJD
ORDER DEFERRING RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
ASSIGN CASE TO COURT’S ADR PROGRAM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?