Lubisch v. Commission on Judicial Performance

Filing 14

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIUS APPLICATION. Plaintiff must file the necessary documents no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed. In the alternative, Plaintiff may pay the filing fee in the same time provided. Failure to file a timely response in accordance with this order by filing a complete IFP application or paying the filing fee in the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 4/9/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 GREG LUBISCH, Plaintiff, 12 13 v. 14 15 COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 13-05170 EJD (PR) ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION 17 18 On November 6, 2013, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed the 19 instant civil rights action in pro se pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and an In Forma 20 Pauperis (“IFP”) Application. On the same day, Plaintiff was notified that his IFP 21 application was deficient because it lacked the following documents: (1) a Certificate 22 of Funds in Prisoner’s Account completed and signed by an authorized prison official; 23 and (2) a copy of Plaintiff’s trust account statement showing transactions for the last 24 six months. (Docket No. 3.) On November 27, 2013, Plaintiff filed a second IFP 25 application, which is deficient for the same reasons.1 (Docket No. 5.) Plaintiff also 26 filed a short form application to proceed without prepaying fees or costs, which is 27 1 28 The attached Certificate of Funds was not completed by an authorized prison official. (Docket No. 5 at 5.) Order Granting EOT to file IFP App. P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.13\05170Lubisch-eot-ifp.wpd 1 2 insufficient and not supported by the required documents. (Docket No. 8.) In the interest of justice, Plaintiff is granted an extension of time to file the 3 missing documents to complete the IFP application. Plaintiff must file the necessary 4 documents no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date this order is filed. In 5 the alternative, Plaintiff may pay the filing fee in the same time provided. 6 Failure to file a timely response in accordance with this order by filing a 7 complete IFP application or paying the filing fee in the time provided will result in 8 the dismissal of this action without further notice to Plaintiff. 9 DATED: 4/9/2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order Granting EOT to file IFP App. P:\PRO-SE\EJD\CR.13\05170Lubisch-eot-ifp.wpd 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GREG LUBISCH, Case Number: CV13-05170 EJD Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 4/10/2014 That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Greg Lubisch J-12674079 Hall of Justice 850 Bryant Street, 7th Floor San Francisco, CA 94103 Dated: 4/10/2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?