Minkler v. Apple Inc

Filing 23

STIPULATION Continuing Apple Inc.'s Time to Respond to Complaint filed by Apple Inc. Based on the foregoing and pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Northern District of California, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend Apple's time to respond to the Complaint as follows: March 3, 2014 Apple's last day to file its pleading challenge. The parties further agree that this extension will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. (Hall, Paul) (Filed on 2/21/2014) Modified text on 2/24/2014 (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

PAUL J. HALL (SBN 066084)
[e-mail]
ALEC CIERNY (SBN 275230)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Joseph Collins (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
203 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1900
Chicago, IL 60601-1293
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Apple Inc.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14
15
16
17
18
19

NANCY ROMINE MINKLER,
individually and on Behalf of All Others
Similarly Situated,
Plaintiffs,

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05332-EJD
STIPULATION CONTINUING APPLE
INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT

v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1-

DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRA NCI S CO

EAST\69719845.1

STIPULATION CONTINUING APPLE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-05332-EJD

1
2

STIPULATION
To provide defendant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) with further time in which to resolve the scope

3

of its intended pleading challenge in response to the Complaint, plaintiff Nancy Romine Minkler

4

has agreed to extend Apple’s time to respond to the Complaint to and including March 3, 2014.

5

Based on the foregoing and pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) of the Northern District of

6

California, the parties, by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate and agree to

7

extend Apple’s time to respond to the Complaint as follows:

8
9
10



March 3, 2014 – Apple’s last day to file its pleading challenge.

The parties further agree that this extension will not alter the date of any event or any
deadline already fixed by Court order.

11
12
13

Dated: February 21, 2014

14

STEWART & STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Joseph Paul Lynn
JOSEPH PAUL LYNN
Counsel for Plaintiff Nancy Romine Minkler

15
16
17

Dated: February 21, 2014

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

18
By: /s/ Paul J. Hall
PAUL J. HALL
Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRA NCI S CO

-2EAST\69719845.1

STIPULATION CONTINUING APPLE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-05332-EJD

1
2

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of

3

this document has been obtained from JOSEPH PAUL LYNN, which shall serve in lieu of his

4

signature on the document.

5
6

Dated: February 21, 2014

7

DLA PIPER LLP (US)
By: /s/ Paul J. Hall
PAUL J. HALL
Counsel for Defendant Apple Inc.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN FRA NCI S CO

-3EAST\69719845.1

STIPULATION CONTINUING APPLE INC.’S TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
CASE NO. 5:13-CV-05332-EJD