Minkler v. Apple Inc

Filing 38

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise indicated a reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/23/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05332 EJD

NANCY ROMINE MINKLER,
inidividually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,

ORDER DISMISSING CASE

12
Plaintiff(s),
13
14

v.
APPLE, INC.,

15
Defendant(s).
16
17

/
On August 20, 2014, the court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend,

18

and subsequently ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before September 19, 2014.

19

See Docket Item Nos. 36, 37. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or

20

otherwise indicated a reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH

21

PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment

22

will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

Dated: September 23, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05332 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE