Minkler v. Apple Inc
Filing
38
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise indicated a reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/23/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05332 EJD
NANCY ROMINE MINKLER,
inidividually and on behalf of all others
similarly situated,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
12
Plaintiff(s),
13
14
v.
APPLE, INC.,
15
Defendant(s).
16
17
/
On August 20, 2014, the court granted Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend,
18
and subsequently ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint on or before September 19, 2014.
19
See Docket Item Nos. 36, 37. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or
20
otherwise indicated a reason for not doing so. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH
21
PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Judgment
22
will be entered in favor of Defendant and the Clerk shall close this file.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: September 23, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05332 EJD
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?