Capstone Financial Group, Inc. v. Spectre Performance et al
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT. Stipulated Dismissal or Joint Statement due by 5/30/2014. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 6/6/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are TERMINATED. Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss the action. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/9/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CAPSTONE FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:
SPECTRE PERFORMANCE ET AL,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
The parties, having filed a Notice of Settlement on May 28, 2014 (See Docket Item No. 28),
are ordered to appear before the Honorable Edward J. Davila on June 6, 2014 at 10:00 am in
Courtroom No. 4, 5th Floor, United States District Court, 280 South First Street, San Jose,
California, 95113, to show cause why the case should not be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 41(b). On or before May 30, 2014, the parties shall file a joint statement in
response to the Order to Show Cause setting forth the status of settlement efforts as well as the
amount of additional time necessary to finalize and file a dismissal.
The Order to Show Cause shall be automatically vacated and the parties relieved of the
obligation to file a joint statement if a stipulated dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 41(a) is filed on or before May 30, 2014.
All other pretrial deadlines and hearing dates are VACATED and any pending motions are
Failure to comply with any part of this Order will be deemed sufficient grounds to dismiss
IT IS SO ORDERED.
EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?