Bay Area Surgical Group Inc. et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
26
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AS TO Aetna Life Insurance Company re #16 Stipulation filed by Aetna Life Insurance Company. Response due 1/10/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/13/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2013)
S
H
ER
R NIA
rd J . D a
vila
FO
d wa
J u d ge E
LI
UNIT
ED
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
4
RT
U
O
Attorneys for Aetna Life Insurance Company
3
RT
6
2
NO
5
RICHARD J. DOREN,SBN 124666
rdoren@gibsondunn.com
HEATHER L. RICHARDSON,SBN 246517
hrichardson@gibsondunn.com
GIBSON,DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
333 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197
Telephone: 213.229.7000
Facsimile: 213.229.7520
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
7
F
D IS T IC T O
R
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
12/13/2013
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
C
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
Bay Area Surgical Group, Inc., et al.,
12
13
Plaintiffs,
EJD
CASE NO. CV 13-05430-LHK
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
v.
Judge:
14
Hon. Lucy H. Kohn
Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al.,
Trial Date: None Set
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn
CrutcherLLP
& I)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL
1
Plaintiffs Bay Area Surgical Group,Inc., et al., filed this Action against Defendants Aetna
2
")
(
Life Insurance Company, et al. "Defendants on November 22,2013. Since November 22, 2413,
3
Plaintiffs have been in the process of serving the over three-hundred named Defendants. To permit
4
Defendants sufficient time to engage counsel and to facilitate coordination of Defendants' responses
5
to the Complaint, Plaintiffs agree that no Defendant need respond to the Complaint before
6
January 10, 2014.
7
8
Dated: December 10, 2013
9
DARON TOOCH
KATHERINE M.DRU
HOOPER,LUNDY & BOOKMAN PC
10
11
12
By: /s/ Katherine M.Dru
Katherine M.Dru
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
Dated: December 10, 2013
15
RICHARD J. DOREN
HEATHER L. RICHARDSON
GIBSON,DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
16
17
18
19
By: /s/ Heather L. Richardson
Heather L. Richardson
20
Attorneys for Aetna Life Insurance Company
21
101643659.1
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
CrutcherLLP
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I, Lindie S. Joy, declare as follows:
3
I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the age of
4
eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher
5
LLP,333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071-3197, in said County and State. On
6
December 11, 2013, I served the following document(s):
7
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
8
9
10
11
❑D
BY CM/ECF Electronic Service: I caused such document to be served via the Court's
(NEF)electronic filing system on all registered parties.
❑D
BY First-Class Mail,Postage Prepaid: I caused such document to be served via U.S. mail to
the following non-CM/ECF participant(s):
SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above, on the abovementioned date. I am familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing
correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in
the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is
presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after
date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.
I am employed in the office of Heather Richardson, a member ofthe bar ofthis court, and
that the foregoing documents) was(were) printed on recycled paper.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on
December 11, 2013.
20
,~
21'
Lind' S. J
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Gibson, Dunn &
CrutcherLLP
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT
CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?