Bay Area Surgical Group Inc. et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 26

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AS TO Aetna Life Insurance Company re #16 Stipulation filed by Aetna Life Insurance Company. Response due 1/10/2014. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/13/2013. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/13/2013)

Download PDF
S H ER R NIA rd J . D a vila FO d wa J u d ge E LI UNIT ED DERED O OR IT IS S A 4 RT U O Attorneys for Aetna Life Insurance Company 3 RT 6 2 NO 5 RICHARD J. DOREN,SBN 124666 rdoren@gibsondunn.com HEATHER L. RICHARDSON,SBN 246517 hrichardson@gibsondunn.com GIBSON,DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: 213.229.7000 Facsimile: 213.229.7520 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N 7 F D IS T IC T O R 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 12/13/2013 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 C SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 Bay Area Surgical Group, Inc., et al., 12 13 Plaintiffs, EJD CASE NO. CV 13-05430-LHK STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT v. Judge: 14 Hon. Lucy H. Kohn Aetna Life Insurance Company, et al., Trial Date: None Set 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn CrutcherLLP & I) STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL 1 Plaintiffs Bay Area Surgical Group,Inc., et al., filed this Action against Defendants Aetna 2 ") ( Life Insurance Company, et al. "Defendants on November 22,2013. Since November 22, 2413, 3 Plaintiffs have been in the process of serving the over three-hundred named Defendants. To permit 4 Defendants sufficient time to engage counsel and to facilitate coordination of Defendants' responses 5 to the Complaint, Plaintiffs agree that no Defendant need respond to the Complaint before 6 January 10, 2014. 7 8 Dated: December 10, 2013 9 DARON TOOCH KATHERINE M.DRU HOOPER,LUNDY & BOOKMAN PC 10 11 12 By: /s/ Katherine M.Dru Katherine M.Dru 13 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 Dated: December 10, 2013 15 RICHARD J. DOREN HEATHER L. RICHARDSON GIBSON,DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 16 17 18 19 By: /s/ Heather L. Richardson Heather L. Richardson 20 Attorneys for Aetna Life Insurance Company 21 101643659.1 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherLLP 2 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 I, Lindie S. Joy, declare as follows: 3 I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California; I am over the age of 4 eighteen years and am not a party to this action; my business address is Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher 5 LLP,333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, California 90071-3197, in said County and State. On 6 December 11, 2013, I served the following document(s): 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 8 9 10 11 ❑D BY CM/ECF Electronic Service: I caused such document to be served via the Court's (NEF)electronic filing system on all registered parties. ❑D BY First-Class Mail,Postage Prepaid: I caused such document to be served via U.S. mail to the following non-CM/ECF participant(s): SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I placed a true copy in a sealed envelope addressed as indicated above, on the abovementioned date. I am familiar with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. It is deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. I am employed in the office of Heather Richardson, a member ofthe bar ofthis court, and that the foregoing documents) was(were) printed on recycled paper. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on December 11, 2013. 20 ,~ 21' Lind' S. J 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & CrutcherLLP 3 STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.CV 13-05430- HRL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?