Horus Vision, LLC v. APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC et al

Filing 120

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 7/31/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/31/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

COOLEY LLP
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
([e-mail])
DANIEL J. KNAUSS (267414)
([e-mail])
SARAH B. WHITNEY (292974)
([e-mail])
3175 Hanover Street
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1130
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

DURIE TANGRI
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS (SBN 209203)
([e-mail])
MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913)
([e-mail])
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

DAVID A. CASIMIR
([e-mail])
KIRK J. HOGAN ([e-mail])
CASIMIR JONES, S.C.
2275 Deming Way, Suite 310
Middleton, Wisconsin 53562
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

11
12

Attorneys for Plaintiff
HORUS VISION, LLC

BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
LYNN C. TYLER (pro hac vice)
([e-mail])
11 South Meridian Street
Indianapolis, IN 46204
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC,
APPLIED BALLISTICS, INC., and
APPLIED BALLISTICS MEDIA, INC.

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
HORUS VISION, LLC,

Case No. 5:13-cv-05460-BLF

17

STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE;

Plaintiff,
18
19
20

v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC, APPLIED
BALLISTICS, INC., and APPLIED
BALLISTICS MEDIA, INC.

21

Ctrm:
Judge:

Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26

3, 5th Floor
Hon. Beth L. Freeman

Case No. 5:14-cv-05206-BLF
HORUS VISION, LLC,

STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE;

Plaintiff,
v.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC, APPLIED
BALLISTICS, INC., and APPLIED
BALLISTICS MEDIA, INC.,

Ctrm:
Judge:

3, 5th Floor
Hon. Beth L. Freeman

27
28

Defendants.

COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO

1

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NOS. 5:13-CV-05460-BLF
5:14-CV-05206-BLF

1

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) and 41(c), Plaintiff and Counterclaim

2

Defendant Horus Vision, LLC (“Horus Vision”) and Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs

3

Applied Ballistics, LLC, Applied Ballistics, Inc., and Applied Ballistics Media, Inc. (“Applied

4

Ballistics”) stipulate that Horus Vision’s claims are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety and

5

Applied Ballistics’ first counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity is dismissed without

6

prejudice and their second counterclaim seeking a declaration of non-infringement is dismissed

7

with prejudice. Judge Freeman, or in her absence, the Northern District of California, will retain

8

jurisdiction to enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are

9

incorporated herein by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

10
11

By his signature below, counsel for Horus Vision attests under penalty of perjury that
counsel for Applied Ballistics concurs in the filing of this document.

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: July 31, 2015

Respectfully submitted,
COOLEY LLP
/s/ Daniel J. Knauss
DANIEL J. KNAUSS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HORUS VISION, LLC
BARNES & THORNBURG LLP
/s/ Lynn C. Tyler
Lynn C. Tyler
Attorneys for Defendants
APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC
APPLIED BALLISTICS, INC.
APPLIED BALLISTICS MEDIA, INC.

25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO

2

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NOS. 5:13-CV-05460-BLF
5:14-CV-05206-BLF

1
2
3

FILER’S ATTESTION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5.1, the undersigned attests that all Parties have concurred in
the filing of this Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and [Proposed] Order.

4
5
6
7
8

Dated: July 31, 2015

COOLEY LLP
/s/ Daniel J. Knauss
DANIEL J. KNAUSS
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HORUS VISION, LLC

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO

3

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NOS. 5:13-CV-05460-BLF
5:14-CV-05206-BLF

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION OF ALL PARTIES, AND FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN:

4

Horus Vision’s claims are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety and Applied Ballistics’

5

first counterclaim seeking a declaration of invalidity is dismissed without prejudice and their

6

second counterclaim seeking a declaration of non-infringement is dismissed with prejudice. The

7

undersigned, or in my absence, the Northern District of California, shall retain jurisdiction to

8

enforce the parties’ confidential settlement agreement (the terms of which are incorporated herein

9

by reference). Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12
13

Dated: _______, 2015

________________________________________

14
The Honorable Beth L. Freeman
United States District Judge
Northern District of California

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
PALO AL TO

4

DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
CASE NOS. 5:13-CV-05460-BLF
5:14-CV-05206-BLF