Horus Vision, LLC v. APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC et al
Filing
99
ORDER GRANTING 78 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT. Plaintiff is required to E-FILE the amended document on or before 4/6/2015. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/27/2015. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
HORUS VISION, LLC,
Case No. 13-cv-05460-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT
9
10
APPLIED BALLISTICS, LLC, et al.,
[RE: ECF 78]
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend its complaint came on for hearing on March 26,
14
2015. The Court has considered the briefing as well as the oral arguments of counsel presented at
15
the hearing. Plaintiff’s motion is governed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(2), which
16
directs that “[t]he court should freely give leave when justice so requires.” Fed. R. Civ. P.
17
15(a)(2). There is no evidence that the motion is brought in bad faith; Plaintiff has not unduly
18
delayed in bringing the motion; the motion is not futile; and there is no undue prejudice to
19
Defendants. See Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (listing factors to be considered when
20
determining if leave to amend is appropriate under Rule 15(a)). For these reasons and the reasons
21
stated on the record at the hearing, Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend is GRANTED. The
22
amended complaint shall be filed on or before April 6, 2015 and service of process shall be
23
effected upon the newly added defendant, Applied Ballistics Media, Inc., as soon as is practicable.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
27
28
Dated: March 27, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?