Camacho et al v. Calderon et al
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 13 selecting Mediation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 3/19/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2014)
*E-Filed: March 19, 2014*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ALBERTO CAMACHO, eta!.,
CASE NO. CV-13-05649 HRL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
1. ASCENCION CALDERON, et al.,
Counsel report that they have met and confen·ed regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil LR. 16-8 and ADR LR. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR LR. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR LR. 5)
Mediation (ADR LR. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe thai an early settlement conference with a Afagistrate Judge is
appreciab(v more likely to meet their needs than any otherform ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may notfile this form. I11ey must insteadjile a Notice ofNeedfor
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private ADR (please identifv process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of !Ire order
referring the case to an ADR process unless othenvise ordered.)
other requested deadline _May 31, 2014 -~-~~~~---··---~
C01\IT!NlJE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 19, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
HOWARD R. LLOYD
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?