Connolly v. The Santa Cruz Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 23

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It appears that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by May 21, 2014, file a Case Management Conference Statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed, the court will dismiss her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci vil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the court.In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 9, 2014, is VACATED and will be reset by the court if necessary. I n addition, this action, including all matters related to discovery, are STAYED pending resolution of the Order to Show Cause. ***5/9/2014 CMC Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 5/7/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/7/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05714 EJD

COURTNEY CONNOLLY,

11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Plaintiff(s),

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

v.
THE SANTA CRUZ SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et. al.,

14
15

Defendant(s).
/

16
17

On December 18, 2013, the court issued an order which scheduled the above-entitled action

18

for a Case Management Conference on May 9, 2014, and required the parties to file a Joint Case

19

Management Conference Statement on or before May 2, 2014. See Docket Item No. 5. Defendants

20

and Third Party Defendant filed their own Joint Case Management Statement in response to the

21

order after attempting to obtain Plaintiff’s input. See Docket Item No. 22. As of the date and time

22

this order was filed, Plaintiff has not complied.

23

It appears that Plaintiff has abandoned this action. Accordingly, the court hereby issues an

24

order to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute or for failure to

25

comply with a court order. If Plaintiff does not, by May 21, 2014, file a Case Management

26

Conference Statement or otherwise demonstrate good cause in writing why this case should not be

27

dismissed, the court will dismiss her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

28

Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by
1
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05714 EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

1

the court.

2

In light of this order, the Case Management Conference scheduled for May 9, 2014, is

3

VACATED and will be reset by the court if necessary. In addition, this action, including all matters

4

related to discovery, are STAYED pending resolution of the Order to Show Cause.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated: May 7, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-05714 EJD
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

COURTNEY CONNOLLY,

Case Number: CV-13-05714 EJD

Plaintiff,

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

v.
THE SANTA CRUZ SHERIFF POLICE
DEPARTMENT ET AL
Defendant.

/

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on May 7, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Courtney Connolly
P.O. Box 825
Soquel, CA 95073
Dated: May 7, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
/s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk