The Phoenix Insurance Company et al v. Infinity Contact, Inc. et al
Filing
73
ORDER APPROVING 72 STIPULATION TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Re-noticed motion for summary judgment shall be heard on 5/14/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/15/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MARK D. PETERSON (State Bar #126174)
CATES PETERSON LLP
4100 Newport Place, Suite 230
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Telephone: (949) 724-1180
Facsimile: (949) 724-1190
Email: markpeterson@catespeterson.com
CHARLES E. SPEVACEK (MN #126044)
MICHAEL P. MCNAMEE (MN #277964)
MEAGHER & GEER, P.L.L.P
33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4400
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Telephone: (612) 338-0661
Facsimile: (612) 338-8384
Email: cspevacek@meagher.com
Email: mmcNamee@meagher.com
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY,
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY,
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
OF CONNECTICUT, AND TRAVELERS
PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE)
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation;
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation;
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY
COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a
Connecticut corporation; TRAVELERS
PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF
AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation,
Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants,
v.
INFINITY CONTACT, INC., an Iowa
corporation; and NUANCE
COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendants and Counter-Claimants
CASE NO. 5:13-cv-5905 BLF
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015
DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY
JUDGMENT MOTION OR TO FILE
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL, IN ORDER
TO ACCOMMODATE JANUARY 20, 2015
GLOBAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
DEMAND FOR JURY
Courtroom: 3
Judge:
Hon. Beth Labson Freeman
Floor:
5
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Defendant
2
NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs THE PHOENIX
3
INSURANCE COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS
4
INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
5
COMPANY OFAMERICA (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (together, with Defendant, the “Parties”),
6
through their undersigned counsel, hereby file the following stipulated request to extend the
7
deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order of October 29, 2014, Docket Entry No. 67. (“October 29
8
Order”). The Parties respectfully request that the Court extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to re-notice their
9
Motion for Summary Judgment, or for the Parties to file a Stipulation of Dismissal, to March 2,
10
2015. Should Plaintiffs choose to re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, the Parties
11
respectfully request that the Court extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition until April 1,
12
2015; extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply until April 22, 2015; and set the hearing on
13
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Thursday, May 7, 2015 or as soon thereafter as the
14
Court has availability. In support of this request, the Parties stipulate as follows:
15
WHEREAS, on June 2, 2014, the Court issued a Case Management Order, Docket
16
Entry No. 46 (“CMO”) setting forth the following schedule with respect to motions for summary
17
judgment:
18
19
20
21
Parties to file Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment
Response to Motion for Summary
Judgment
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing
June 30, 2014
July 30, 2014
August 20, 2014
November 6, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.
22
WHEREAS, on June 30, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Motion with this Court;
23
WHEREAS, on July 15, 2014, the Parties initiated discussions relating to potential
24
25
settlement of this action;
WHEREAS, to further explore potential settlement of this action, the Parties
26
stipulated on July 18, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the Motion until
27
Friday, August 15, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the Motion until Friday,
28
September 5, 2014;
2
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF
1
2
3
WHEREAS, on August 26, 2014, the Parties reached a settlement, in principal, and
began preparing an agreement to memorialize the settlement;
WHEREAS, to provide the Parties with time to draft the settlement agreement, the
4
Parties stipulated on August 28, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the
5
Motion until September 29, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the Motion until
6
October 22, 2014;
7
WHEREAS, to provide the Parties with additional time to draft the settlement
8
agreement, the Parties stipulated on September 29, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its
9
opposition to the Motion until October 29, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the
10
11
Motion until November 24, 2014;
WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Parties filed their Fifth Joint Stipulation to
12
Revise Briefing Schedule for Opposition and Reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
13
Under that Stipulation, the Parties proposed that Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the
14
Motion be extended until Thursday, January 29, 2015; that Plaintiffs’ deadline to file its reply to the
15
Motion be extended until Monday, February 23, 2015; and that, if the settlement agreement were not
16
effectuated, a hearing on the Motion be scheduled for Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., or at
17
the Court’s earliest convenience thereafter;
18
WHEREAS, on October 29, 2014, the Court denied as moot the Fifth Joint
19
Stipulation, and instead issued an Order requiring Plaintiffs to re-notice their Motion for Summary
20
Judgment, or requiring the Parties to file a Stipulation of Dismissal, by January 15, 2015;
21
22
23
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2014, after the Court issued its October 29 Order, the
Court referred this matter to Magistrate Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement;
WHEREAS, On December 12, 2014, Magistrate Corley ordered a global settlement
24
conference in this insurance coverage matter and in the underlying matter, captioned William
25
Hopwood and Teresa Martinez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Nuance
26
Communications, Inc. and Infinity Contact, Inc., Case No. CV-13-2132-YGR (N.D. Cal. May 8,
27
2013) (“Global Settlement Conference”), to be scheduled for January 12, 2015;
28
3
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF
1
WHEREAS, after holding a telephonic settlement conference with defense counsel on
2
January 5, 2015, Magistrate Corley continued the Global Settlement Conference until January 20,
3
2015;
4
WHEREAS, under Magistrate Corley’s continuation to January 20, 2015, the Global
5
Settlement Conference is now scheduled for five days after the January 15, 2015 deadline set forth in
6
this Court’s October 29 Order;
7
WHEREAS, an extension of the deadlines set forth in the Court’s October 29 Order is
8
necessary to accommodate the Global Settlement Conference and any necessary follow-up work
9
related to settlement;
10
WHEREAS, no Party will be prejudiced by the relief requested in the stipulation;
11
WHEREAS, this stipulation is without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or
12
13
14
15
defenses otherwise available to the Parties in this action;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the
parties hereto that:
1) Plaintiffs’ shall have through and including March 2, 2015 to re-notice their Motion for
16
Summary Judgment or, alternatively, the Parties shall have through and including March
17
2, 2015 to file a Stipulation of Dismissal;
18
19
20
21
22
2) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant shall have
through and including April 1, 2015, to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion;
3) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs shall have
through and including, April 22, 2015 to file their reply in support their Motion; and
4) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, the hearing on the
23
Motion shall be scheduled for Thursday, May 7, 2015 or as soon thereafter as the court
24
has availability.
25
26
27
28
4
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF
1
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
2
Dated: January 15, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
3
4
By: /s/ Mark D. Peterson
Mark D. Peterson
CATES PETERSON LLP
4100 Newport Place, suite 230
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Tel: (949) 724-1180
Fax: (949) 724-1190
Email: markpeterson@catespeterson.com
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
The Phoenix Insurance Company, The
Travelers Indemnity Company, The Travelers
Indemnity Company of Connecticut, and
Travelers Property Casualty Company of
America
9
10
11
12
Dated: January 15, 2015
Respectfully submitted,
13
By: /s/ Nicole L. Chessari
Michael T. Jones (SBN 661336)
Nicole L. Chessari (SBN 259970)
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, California 94025-1105
Tel.: 650.752.3100
Fax.: 650.853.1038
14
15
16
17
18
Attorneys for Defendant
Nuance Communications, Inc.
19
20
21
22
23
24
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Plaintiffs shall re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment for hearing on May 14, 2015.
DATED: January 15, 2015
25
26
HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
27
28
5
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO
EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?