The Phoenix Insurance Company et al v. Infinity Contact, Inc. et al

Filing 73

ORDER APPROVING 72 STIPULATION TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL. Re-noticed motion for summary judgment shall be heard on 5/14/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 1/15/2015. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 MARK D. PETERSON (State Bar #126174) CATES PETERSON LLP 4100 Newport Place, Suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 724-1180 Facsimile: (949) 724-1190 Email: markpeterson@catespeterson.com CHARLES E. SPEVACEK (MN #126044) MICHAEL P. MCNAMEE (MN #277964) MEAGHER & GEER, P.L.L.P 33 South Sixth Street, Suite 4400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 338-0661 Facsimile: (612) 338-8384 Email: cspevacek@meagher.com Email: mmcNamee@meagher.com 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and Cross-Defendants THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, AND TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN JOSE) THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, a Connecticut corporation; TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a Connecticut corporation, Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, v. INFINITY CONTACT, INC., an Iowa corporation; and NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendants and Counter-Claimants CASE NO. 5:13-cv-5905 BLF JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR TO FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL, IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE JANUARY 20, 2015 GLOBAL SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE DEMAND FOR JURY Courtroom: 3 Judge: Hon. Beth Labson Freeman Floor: 5 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, Defendant 2 NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (“Defendant”) and Plaintiffs THE PHOENIX 3 INSURANCE COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY, THE TRAVELERS 4 INDEMNITY COMPANY OF CONNECTICUT, and TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY 5 COMPANY OFAMERICA (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (together, with Defendant, the “Parties”), 6 through their undersigned counsel, hereby file the following stipulated request to extend the 7 deadlines set forth in the Court’s Order of October 29, 2014, Docket Entry No. 67. (“October 29 8 Order”). The Parties respectfully request that the Court extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to re-notice their 9 Motion for Summary Judgment, or for the Parties to file a Stipulation of Dismissal, to March 2, 10 2015. Should Plaintiffs choose to re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, the Parties 11 respectfully request that the Court extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition until April 1, 12 2015; extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply until April 22, 2015; and set the hearing on 13 Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment for Thursday, May 7, 2015 or as soon thereafter as the 14 Court has availability. In support of this request, the Parties stipulate as follows: 15 WHEREAS, on June 2, 2014, the Court issued a Case Management Order, Docket 16 Entry No. 46 (“CMO”) setting forth the following schedule with respect to motions for summary 17 judgment: 18 19 20 21 Parties to file Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment Response to Motion for Summary Judgment Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing June 30, 2014 July 30, 2014 August 20, 2014 November 6, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. 22 WHEREAS, on June 30, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Motion with this Court; 23 WHEREAS, on July 15, 2014, the Parties initiated discussions relating to potential 24 25 settlement of this action; WHEREAS, to further explore potential settlement of this action, the Parties 26 stipulated on July 18, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the Motion until 27 Friday, August 15, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the Motion until Friday, 28 September 5, 2014; 2 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF 1 2 3 WHEREAS, on August 26, 2014, the Parties reached a settlement, in principal, and began preparing an agreement to memorialize the settlement; WHEREAS, to provide the Parties with time to draft the settlement agreement, the 4 Parties stipulated on August 28, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the 5 Motion until September 29, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the Motion until 6 October 22, 2014; 7 WHEREAS, to provide the Parties with additional time to draft the settlement 8 agreement, the Parties stipulated on September 29, 2014 to extend Defendant’s deadline to file its 9 opposition to the Motion until October 29, 2014 and Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their reply to the 10 11 Motion until November 24, 2014; WHEREAS, on October 28, 2014, the Parties filed their Fifth Joint Stipulation to 12 Revise Briefing Schedule for Opposition and Reply to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment. 13 Under that Stipulation, the Parties proposed that Defendant’s deadline to file its opposition to the 14 Motion be extended until Thursday, January 29, 2015; that Plaintiffs’ deadline to file its reply to the 15 Motion be extended until Monday, February 23, 2015; and that, if the settlement agreement were not 16 effectuated, a hearing on the Motion be scheduled for Thursday, March 12, 2015 at 9:00 a.m., or at 17 the Court’s earliest convenience thereafter; 18 WHEREAS, on October 29, 2014, the Court denied as moot the Fifth Joint 19 Stipulation, and instead issued an Order requiring Plaintiffs to re-notice their Motion for Summary 20 Judgment, or requiring the Parties to file a Stipulation of Dismissal, by January 15, 2015; 21 22 23 WHEREAS, on November 18, 2014, after the Court issued its October 29 Order, the Court referred this matter to Magistrate Jacqueline Scott Corley for settlement; WHEREAS, On December 12, 2014, Magistrate Corley ordered a global settlement 24 conference in this insurance coverage matter and in the underlying matter, captioned William 25 Hopwood and Teresa Martinez, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Nuance 26 Communications, Inc. and Infinity Contact, Inc., Case No. CV-13-2132-YGR (N.D. Cal. May 8, 27 2013) (“Global Settlement Conference”), to be scheduled for January 12, 2015; 28 3 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF 1 WHEREAS, after holding a telephonic settlement conference with defense counsel on 2 January 5, 2015, Magistrate Corley continued the Global Settlement Conference until January 20, 3 2015; 4 WHEREAS, under Magistrate Corley’s continuation to January 20, 2015, the Global 5 Settlement Conference is now scheduled for five days after the January 15, 2015 deadline set forth in 6 this Court’s October 29 Order; 7 WHEREAS, an extension of the deadlines set forth in the Court’s October 29 Order is 8 necessary to accommodate the Global Settlement Conference and any necessary follow-up work 9 related to settlement; 10 WHEREAS, no Party will be prejudiced by the relief requested in the stipulation; 11 WHEREAS, this stipulation is without prejudice to, or waiver of, any rights or 12 13 14 15 defenses otherwise available to the Parties in this action; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between the parties hereto that: 1) Plaintiffs’ shall have through and including March 2, 2015 to re-notice their Motion for 16 Summary Judgment or, alternatively, the Parties shall have through and including March 17 2, 2015 to file a Stipulation of Dismissal; 18 19 20 21 22 2) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, Defendant shall have through and including April 1, 2015, to file its opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion; 3) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs shall have through and including, April 22, 2015 to file their reply in support their Motion; and 4) Should Plaintiffs re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment, the hearing on the 23 Motion shall be scheduled for Thursday, May 7, 2015 or as soon thereafter as the court 24 has availability. 25 26 27 28 4 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 2 Dated: January 15, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 3 4 By: /s/ Mark D. Peterson Mark D. Peterson CATES PETERSON LLP 4100 Newport Place, suite 230 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Tel: (949) 724-1180 Fax: (949) 724-1190 Email: markpeterson@catespeterson.com 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiffs The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America 9 10 11 12 Dated: January 15, 2015 Respectfully submitted, 13 By: /s/ Nicole L. Chessari Michael T. Jones (SBN 661336) Nicole L. Chessari (SBN 259970) GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 135 Commonwealth Drive Menlo Park, California 94025-1105 Tel.: 650.752.3100 Fax.: 650.853.1038 14 15 16 17 18 Attorneys for Defendant Nuance Communications, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. Plaintiffs shall re-notice their Motion for Summary Judgment for hearing on May 14, 2015. DATED: January 15, 2015 25 26 HONORABLE BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge 27 28 5 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND JANUARY 15, 2015 DEADLINE TO RE-NOTICE SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION OR FILE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL Case No. 5:13-cv-05905-BLF

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?