Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al

Filing 149

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting 148 Joint Motion to Dismiss action (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/19/2015)

1

[Counsel Listed on Signature Page]

2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND

11

Google Inc.,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW
JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

v.
Rockstar Consortium US LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC,

Hon. Claudia Wilken

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

1

TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

2

Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rockstar Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar

3

Technologies LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against

4

Defendants and Defendants’ counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case.

5
NOW, THEREFORE, Plaintiff and Defendants, through their attorneys of record, request this
6
7

Court to dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants without prejudice and Defendants’
claims, defenses, or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff with prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees,

8
costs of court and expenses borne by the party incurring the same.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

1

DATED: February 18, 2015

2

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN,
LLP

By /s/ David Sochia
Courtland L. Reichman
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive Suite 510
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)

By: /s/ Patrick D. Curran
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
Sean Pak (Cal. Bar No. 219032)
David Eiseman (Cal. Bar No. 114758)
Kristin J. Madigan (Cal. Bar No. 233436)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
[phone] facsimile

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

Mike McKool (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Douglas A. Cawley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
Ted Stevenson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
David Sochia (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
Joshua W. Budwin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
300 W. 6th Street, Suite 1700
Austin, TX 78701
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
Attorneys for Defendants Rockstar
Consortium U.S. LP and MobileStar
Technologies LLC

Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
[phone]
[phone] facsimile
Patrick D. Curran (Cal. Bar No. 241630)
[e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
New York, New York 10010
[phone]
[phone] facsimile
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

ATTESTATION

1
2

I, Patrick D. Curran, am the ECF user whose userid and password authorized the filing of this

3

document. Under Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that David Sochia has concurred in this filing.

4

DATED: February 18, 2015

5
6

/s/ Patrick D. Curran
Patrick D. Curran

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3Case No. 4:13-cv-5933-CW

JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS

1







UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



OAKLAND DIVISION





GOOGLE INC.,
Plaintiff,




CASE NO. 13-cv-5933-CW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO DISMISS

v.

ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP and
 MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,


Defendants.














Case No. 13-cv-5933-CW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

1

On this day, Plaintiff Google Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Rockstar Consortium U.S.

2 LP and MobileStar Technologies LLC (collectively, “Defendants”) announced to the Court that
3
4

they have resolved Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants asserted in this case and
Defendants’ claims, defenses, and/or counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff asserted in this case.

5
6
7

Plaintiff and Defendants have therefore requested that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for
relief against Defendants without prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses, and/or

8 counterclaims for relief against Plaintiff with prejudice, and with all attorneys’ fees, costs and
9 expenses taxed against the party incurring the same. The Court, having considered this request, is
10 of the opinion that their request for dismissal should be granted.
11

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claims for relief against Defendants are

12

dismissed without prejudice and Defendants’ claims, defenses, and/or counterclaims for relief

13

against Plaintiff are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys’

14

fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same.

15
16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18

DATED:

February 19, 2015
The Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 13-cv-5933-CW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

-1-