Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO GOOGLE'S COMPLAINT filed by MobileStar Technologies LLC, Rockstar Consortium US LP, Google Inc. (Reichman, Courtland) (Filed on 1/14/2014) Modified on 1/15/2014 (cpS, COURT STAFF).

1 Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
[e-mail]
 MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN P.C.
255 Shoreline Drive, Suite 510
 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
 Fax: [phone]
 Mike McKool, Jr.
(Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
 [e-mail]
Douglas A. Cawley
 (Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
[e-mail]
 Theodore Stevenson, III
(Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
 [e-mail]
David Sochia
 (Pro Hac Vice Application to be filed)
[e-mail]
 MCKOOL SMITH P.C.
300 Crescent Court, Suite 1500
 Dallas, TX 75201
Telephone: [phone]
 Fax: [phone]

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Sean Pak (Cal. Bar No. 219032)
[e-mail]
Amy H. Candido (Cal. Bar No. 237829)
[e-mail]
Matthew S. Warren (Cal. Bar No. 230565)
[e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
Attorneys for Plaintiff GOOGLE INC.

 Attorneys for Defendants
Rockstar Consortium US LP and MobileStar
 Technologies LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



OAKLAND DIVISION


 GOOGLE INC.,

CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW



STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO
GOOGLE’S COMPLAINT



Plaintiff,
v.

 ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, and
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Defendants.




CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S COMPLAINT

1

WHEREAS, on December 23, 2013, plaintiff Google Inc. (“Google”) filed a Complaint

2 against Rockstar Consortium US LP (“Rockstar”) and MobileStar Technologies LLC
3 (“MobileStar”) (collectively, “Defendants”);
4

WHEREAS, on December 26, 2013, Google served Defendants with the Complaint;

5

WHEREAS, under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendants have until

6 January 16, 2014, to respond to Google’s Complaint;
7

WHEREAS Defendants have requested and Google has agreed to extend Defendants’

8 deadline to respond to Google’s Complaint by one week, until January 23, 2014;
9

THEREFORE, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties stipulate that Defendants’ time to

10 respond to Google’s Complaint shall be extended to January 23, 2014.
11

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

12
13 DATED: January 14, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

14

MCKOOL SMITH, P.C.

15

By /S/ COURTLAND REICHMAN
Courtland Reichman
Attorneys for Rockstar Consortium US LP and
MobileStar Technologies LLC

16
17
18 DATED: January 14, 2014

Respectfully submitted,

19

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP

20

By /S/ MATTHEW WARREN
Matthew S. Warren
Attorneys for Google Inc.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S COMPLAINT

1
2

ATTESTATION
I, Courtland Reichman, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file

3 this Stipulation. In compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that Matthew S.
4 Warren has concurred in this filing.
5
6 DATED: January 14, 2014

/S/ COURTLAND REICHMAN
Courtland Reichman

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO GOOGLE’S COMPLAINT