Google Inc. v. Rockstar Consortium US LP et al
Filing
94
STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Extending Time for Proposed E-Discovery Order filed by Google Inc., Rockstar Consortium US LP, MobileStar Technologies LLC. (Warren, Matthew) (Filed on 7/18/2014) Modified on 7/21/2014 (cpS, COURT STAFF).
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART
& SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
Sean Pak (Cal. Bar No. 219032)
Matthew S. Warren (Cal. Bar No. 230565)
quinn-google-n.d.cal.-13-05933
@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
(415) 875-6600
(415) 875-6700 facsimile
Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
Mike McKool (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Douglas A. Cawley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Ted Stevenson III (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
David Sochia (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
creichman@mckoolsmithhennigan.com
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
255 Redwood Shores, CA 94065
(650) 394-1400
(650) 394-1422 facsimile
Attorneys for Defendants Rockstar Consortium
U.S. LP and MobileStar Technologies LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff Google Inc.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
GOOGLE INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
PROPOSED E-DISCOVERY ORDER
ROCKSTAR CONSORTIUM US LP, and
MOBILESTAR TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PROPOSED E-DISCOVERY ORDER
1
WHEREAS, in the joint Case Management Statement filed on Thursday, June 19, 2014,
2 Docket No. 81, the parties indicated that they would “submit a proposed e-discovery order within
3 30 days of filing this document;”
4
WHEREAS, in its order of Thursday, June 26, 2014, Docket No. 88, the Court adopted the
5 parties’ Case Management Statement as the Case Management Order except as the Court
6 otherwise indicated;
7
WHEREAS, under the Case Management Statement, the parties have until Monday, July
8 21, 2014, to file a proposed e-discovery order;
9
WHEREAS, the parties wish to present the smallest number of disputed issues, if any, to
10 the Court, and believe a brief extension of one week, until Monday, July 28, 2014, would allow
11 further discussions toward that end;
12
WHEREAS, this extension will not otherwise affect the schedule for this case;
13
WHEREAS, the previous modifications of time in this action include a one-week
14 extension of Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint (Docket No. 17), a four-week
15 continuance of the Case Management Conference (Docket No. 53), and a further four-day
16 extension of Defendants’ time to respond to Plaintiff’s complaint (Docket No. 60);
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PROPOSED E-DISCOVERY ORDER
1
NOW, THEREFORE, under Civil Local Rule 6-2, the parties stipulate and seek the
2 permission of the Court that the deadline for submission of the proposed e-discovery order be
3 extended one week, to Monday, July 28, 2014.
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5 DATED:
July 18, 2014
Respectfully submitted,
6
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
7
By /s Matthew S. Warren
Matthew S. Warren
Attorneys for Google Inc.
8
9
10
McKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN,P.C.
11
By /s Joshua W. Budwin
Joshua W. Budwin
Attorneys for Rockstar Consortium US LP and
MobileStar Technologies LLC
12
13
14
15
16
ATTESTATION
I, Matthew S. Warren, am the ECF User whose userid and password authorized the filing
17 of this document.
Under Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that Joshua W. Budwin has
18 concurred in this filing.
19 DATED: July 18, 2014
/s Matthew S. Warren
Matthew S. Warren
20
21
22
23
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court having considered the stipulation of the parties, orders that the parties shall file
24 a joint proposed e-discovery order on or before Monday, July 28, 2014.
25 PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27 Dated:
28
, 2014
Honorable Claudia Wilken
United States District Judge
CASE NO. 13-cv-05933-CW
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR PROPOSED E-DISCOVERY ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?