Hernandez v. Ross Stores, Inc. et al
Filing
43
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on January 2, 2015. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/2/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
GERARDO HERNANDEZ,
13
14
15
Case No. 13-cv-05956-LHK
Plaintiff,
12
v.
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE
Re: Dkt. No. 41
ROSS STORES, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
On December 27, 2014, the parties filed a “Consent Decree and Proposed Order as to
18
Injunctive Relief Only,” requesting that the Court enter a consent decree and retain jurisdiction for
19
eighteen months. The Court entered the Consent Decree on January 2, 2015. See ECF No. 42.
20
In the Consent Decree, the parties represented that they “have reached an agreement
21
regarding Plaintiff’s claims for damages, attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses and costs,” and that
22
“[t]hese matters will be the subject of a future written settlement agreement.” The parties signed
23
this agreement on December 8, 2014.
24
25
The Court hereby orders the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal without prejudice
within 21 days. The parties shall also stipulate that the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the
26
27
28
1
Case No.:13-cv-05956-LHK
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE
1
2
Consent Decree and any other settlement agreement reached by the parties.
The parties may file a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice once whatever condition the
3
parties deem necessary for a dismissal with prejudice occurs.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
Dated: January 2, 2015
______________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.:13-cv-05956-LHK
ORDER RE CONSENT DECREE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?