Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 115

Declaration of Nikki Stitt Sokol in Support of 110 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Joint Letter Brief on Plaintiffs' Third Set of Requests for Production filed byFacebook Inc.. (Related document(s) 110 ) (Jessen, Joshua) (Filed on 9/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP JOSHUA A. JESSEN, SBN 222831 JJessen@gibsondunn.com JEANA BISNAR MAUTE, SBN 290573 JBisnarMaute@gibsondunn.com ASHLEY M. ROGERS, SBN 286252 ARogers@gibsondunn.com 1881 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 849-5300 Facsimile: (650) 849-5333 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP GAIL E. LEES, SBN 90363 GLees@gibsondunn.com CHRISTOPHER CHORBA, SBN 216692 CChorba@gibsondunn.com 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 Telephone: (213) 229-7000 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 Attorneys for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 OAKLAND DIVISON 17 18 19 20 21 22 MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR, Plaintiffs, v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 I, Nikki Stitt Sokol, declare as follows: 2 1. I am Associate General Counsel for Litigation for Defendant Facebook, Inc. 3 (“Facebook”). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) and the Amended Stipulated Protective Order 4 entered by the Court on July 1, 2015 (the “Protective Order”) (Dkt. No. 93), I submit this Declaration 5 in support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to file under seal portions of the parties’ Joint Letter 6 Brief Regarding Facebook’s Responses to Plaintiffs’ Third Set of Requests for Production (“Joint 7 Letter Brief”) (Dkt. No. 110). Except as otherwise noted, I have personal knowledge of the facts set 8 forth in this Declaration and, if called and sworn as a witness, could and would testify competently to 9 them. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 2. The requested relief is necessary to protect the confidentiality of certain Facebook information relied upon in the Joint Letter Brief. The Joint Letter Brief contains non-public, confidential, and proprietary Facebook business information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. Specifically, the following chart explains which portions of the Joint Letter Brief contain the confidential information that should remain under seal: Page 3 Text Text between “In his June 2015 Declaration, Facebook Engineer Alex Himel stated that he” and “In describing that work, Mr. Himel referenced” 3 Text between “Mr. Himel referenced” and “Such records would be responsive” 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Reason for Confidentiality This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information concerns the processes and functionality of Facebook’s messages technology and source code that is protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. Such information could also be used by individuals or companies that might seek to compromise the security of Facebook’s messages technology, causing harm to Facebook and users of Facebook’s products. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information 1 DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 Page Text 3 Text between “Facebook has published a blog post containing” and “(FB000003105)” 3 Text between “evidence indicates that this outcome was” and “(RFPs 58, 59)” 3, fn 4 Text between “a Facebook employee states” and “FB000003335” 3, fn 4 Text between “FB000000699” and “Documents discussing this” 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Reason for Confidentiality concerns the processes and functionality of Facebook’s messages technology and source code that is protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. Such information could also be used by individuals or companies that might seek to compromise the security of Facebook’s messages technology, causing harm to Facebook and users of Facebook’s products This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This portion of the Joint Letter Brief in Plaintiffs’ section misstates the nature of the document cited, which is a Facebook internal draft document—not a public blog post—regarding Facebook’s technology. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information is a Facebook internal discussion of business and engineering decisions regarding Facebook’s technology that is entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information is a Facebook internal discussion of business and engineering decisions regarding Facebook’s technology that is entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information is a Facebook internal discussion of business and engineering decisions regarding Facebook’s technology that is entitled 2 DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 Page Text 3, fn 4 Text between “Documents discussing this” and “and outcomes thereof” 5, fn 9 Text between “previously produced documents evidence a” and “or”; text between “or” and “that ‘[i]ncreasing the Like count appears to have motivated’” 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Reason for Confidentiality to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information is a Facebook internal discussion of business and engineering decisions regarding Facebook’s technology that is entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. This includes non-public, confidential, and proprietary information that Facebook designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY pursuant to the Protective Order. This information is a Facebook internal discussion of business and engineering decisions regarding Facebook’s messages technology that is entitled to protection under the law. Public disclosure of this information would cause competitive harm to Facebook by allowing its competitors to access sensitive information, which they could use to gain an unfair advantage against Facebook. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America and the 18 State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, and that I executed this Declaration in Menlo 19 Park, California on September 22, 2015. 20 /s/ Nikki Stitt Sokol 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 3 DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ) 1 2 3 4 5 ATTORNEY ATTESTATION I, Joshua A. Jessen, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Declaration of Nikki Stitt Sokol has been obtained from the signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 22nd day of September, 2015, in Irvine, California. 6 /s/ Joshua A. Jessen 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 4 DECLARATION OF NIKKI STITT SOKOL ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT FACEBOOK, INC. IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL – DKT. NO. 110 Case No. C 13-05996 PJH (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?