Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 117

ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion for Extension of Time to File (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES D DISTRICT C COURT 3 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL N RN CT LIFORNIA 4 5 MATTHEW CAMPBELL et al., M C L, v. 7 8 Case No. 13-cv-5996 6-PJH Plaintiffs, 6 ORDER R MOTION TO ENLA RE N ARGE DEADLIN NES FA ACEBOOK INC., K Defendant. 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to e s enlarge time and exten deadline nd es. e 12 Sp pecifically, plaintiffs see an order extending by 90 days the deadlines for the upcoming p ek r s e 13 cla certifica ass ation and su ummary jud dgment mot tions. The current sch hedule requ uires that 14 the motions be filed on October 14, 2015, the oppositions be filed on Decembe 16, 2015 e b O , s er 5, 15 and replies be filed on Ja e anuary 20, 2016, with a hearing s for Febr set ruary 17, 20 016. See 16 Dk 62. kt. 17 Based on the ong going discov very disput es, the cou finds tha some exte urt at ension of 18 e adlines is warranted. However, t 90-day extension s w the sought by p plaintiffs the above dea 19 wo ould unnece essarily dela the case As a res ay e. sult, the cou GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion urt S 20 only in part, and extends each of th above br a s he riefing dead dlines by 30 days. The class 0 e 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 cer rtification motion and motion for summary ju m m s udgment sh be filed by Novem hall mber 13, 2015, the opp positions sh be filed by Januar 15, 2016, and the re hall ry eplies shall be filed by February 19, 2016. The hearing on both mot ions will be held on March 16, 20 e e 016. No fur rther extens sion of thes dates will be grante d. se IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: Septe ember 24, 2015 2 __ __________ __________ __________ _______ PH HYLLIS J. H HAMILTON Un nited States District Ju s udge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?