Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
117
ORDER by Judge Hamilton granting in part and denying in part 109 Motion for Extension of Time to File (pjhlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2015)
1
2
UNITED STATES D
DISTRICT C
COURT
3
NORTHER DISTRIC OF CAL
N
RN
CT
LIFORNIA
4
5
MATTHEW CAMPBELL et al.,
M
C
L,
v.
7
8
Case No. 13-cv-5996
6-PJH
Plaintiffs,
6
ORDER R MOTION TO ENLA
RE
N
ARGE
DEADLIN
NES
FA
ACEBOOK INC.,
K
Defendant.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Before the court is plaintiffs’ motion to e
s
enlarge time and exten deadline
nd
es.
e
12
Sp
pecifically, plaintiffs see an order extending by 90 days the deadlines for the upcoming
p
ek
r
s
e
13
cla certifica
ass
ation and su
ummary jud
dgment mot
tions. The current sch
hedule requ
uires that
14
the motions be filed on October 14, 2015, the oppositions be filed on Decembe 16, 2015
e
b
O
,
s
er
5,
15
and replies be filed on Ja
e
anuary 20, 2016, with a hearing s for Febr
set
ruary 17, 20
016. See
16
Dk 62.
kt.
17
Based on the ong
going discov
very disput es, the cou finds tha some exte
urt
at
ension of
18
e
adlines is warranted. However, t 90-day extension s
w
the
sought by p
plaintiffs
the above dea
19
wo
ould unnece
essarily dela the case As a res
ay
e.
sult, the cou GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion
urt
S
20
only in part, and extends each of th above br
a
s
he
riefing dead
dlines by 30 days. The class
0
e
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
cer
rtification motion and motion for summary ju
m
m
s
udgment sh be filed by Novem
hall
mber 13,
2015, the opp
positions sh be filed by Januar 15, 2016, and the re
hall
ry
eplies shall be filed by
February 19, 2016. The hearing on both mot ions will be held on March 16, 20
e
e
016. No
fur
rther extens
sion of thes dates will be grante d.
se
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: Septe
ember 24, 2015
2
__
__________
__________
__________
_______
PH
HYLLIS J. H
HAMILTON
Un
nited States District Ju
s
udge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?