Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 197

Proposed Order re 195 Stipulation Regarding Removal Of References To Plaintiffs Previously Dismissed Claims In The Second Amended Class Action Complaint by Matthew Campbell, Michael Hurley. (Sobol, Michael) (Filed on 6/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATTHEW CAMPBELL and MICHAEL HURLEY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 Case No. 4:13-cv-05996-PJH (MEJ) [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION REGARDING REMOVAL OF REFERENCES TO PLAINTIFFS’ PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED CLAIMS IN THE SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FACEBOOK, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIP RE PLAINTIFFS’ PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED CLAIMS IN SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:13-CV-05996-PJH (MEJ) 1 Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation Regarding Removal Of References To 2 Plaintiffs’ Previously Dismissed Claims In The Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt. 3 No. 195), and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS the Parties’ stipulation. 4 It is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs may remove references to the dismissed 5 California Invasion of Privacy Act section 632 and California Business and Professions Code 6 section 17200 claims, as well as to the voluntarily dismissed claims of Mr. Shadpour, in 7 Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Class Action Complaint (Dkt. No. 196). 8 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: ________________________ The Honorable Phyllis J. Hamilton United States District Court Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- [PROPOSED] ORDER RE STIP RE PLAINTIFFS’ PREVIOUSLY DISMISSED CLAIMS IN SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT CASE NO. 4:13-CV-05996-PJH (MEJ)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?