Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.

Filing 78

AMENDED Stipulation And [Proposed] Order selecting Mediation by Matthew Campbell, Michael Hurley, David Shadpour (Sobol, Michael) (Filed on 5/26/2015) Modified on 5/27/2015 (vlkS, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR , Plaintiff(s), v. CASE NO. C 13-05996 PJH AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS FACEBOOK, INC. , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following amended stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: ☐ Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) ☐ Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)  Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: ☐ Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: ☐ the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )  other requested deadline June 30, 2015, as previously ordered by the Court (Dkt. 59) Dated: 5/26/15 Michael W. Sobol Attorney for Plaintiffs Dated: 5/26/15 Joshua A. Jessen Attorney for Defendant FACEBOOK, INC. CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER ☐ ☐ Dated: The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?