Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
81
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS (MEDIATION) by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton finding as moot 78 Stipulation selecting Mediation; granting 80 Stipulation selecting Mediation. (napS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/28/2015)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MATTHEW CAMPBELL,
MICHAEL HURLEY, and
DAVID SHADPOUR
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
CASE NO. C 13-05996 PJH
SECOND AMENDED STIPULATION
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING
ADR PROCESS
FACEBOOK, INC.
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following second amended stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
other requested deadline August 24, 2015, 90 days from the date of this Second
Amended Stipulation
Dated:
5/26/15
/s/ Michael W. Sobol
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Dated:
5/26/15
/s/ Joshua A. Jessen
Attorney for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
__________________________________
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
R NIA
Dated: May 28, 2015
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
x
☐
☐
NO
on
UNITED STATEShylMAGISTRATE JUDGE
J. Hamilt
e P lis
FO
A
H
ER
LI
RT
Judg
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
I, Michael W. Sobol, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file this Second Amended Stipulation and [Proposed] Order. I hereby attest that Joshua A.
Jessen has concurred in this filing.
DATED: May 26, 2015
/s/ Michael W. Sobol
Michael W. Sobol
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?