Campbell et al v. Facebook Inc.
Filing
90
Joint Stipulation And [Proposed] Order Continuing The Deposition Of Alex Himel And Removing The Current Source Code Briefing Schedule And Hearing Date filed by Matthew Campbell, Michael Hurley, David Shadpour. (Sobol, Michael) (Filed on 6/26/2015) Modified on 6/29/2015 (vlkS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Michael W. Sobol (State Bar No. 194857)
msobol@lchb.com
Melissa Gardner (State Bar No. 289096)
mgardner@lchb.com
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: 415.956.1000
Facsimile: 415.956.1008
Rachel Geman
rgeman@lchb.com
Nicholas Diamand
ndiamand@lchb.com
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10013-1413
Telephone: 212.355.9500
Facsimile: 212.355.9592
Jeremy A. Lieberman
Lesley F. Portnoy
info@pomlaw.com
POMERANTZ, LLP
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10016
Telephone: 212.661.1100
Facsimile: 212.661.8665
Patrick V. Dahlstrom
pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com
POMERANTZ, LLP
10 S. La Salle Street Suite 3505
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: 312.377.1181
Facsimile: 312.377.1184
Hank Bates (State Bar No. 167688)
hbates@cbplaw.com
Allen Carney
acarney@cbplaw.com
David Slade
dslade@cbplaw.com
CARNEY BATES & PULLIAM, PLLC
11311 Arcade Drive
Little Rock, AR 72212
Telephone: 501.312.8500
Facsimile: 501.312.8505
17
18
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Class
19
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
23
MATTHEW CAMPBELL, MICHAEL
HURLEY, and DAVID SHADPOUR, on
behalf of themselves and all others
similarly situated,
24
25
26
27
Plaintiffs,
Case No. C 13-5996 PJH
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING THE DEPOSITION
OF ALEX HIMEL AND REMOVING THE
CURRENT SOURCE CODE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE
v.
FACEBOOK, INC.,
Defendant.
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING THE DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL
AND REMOVING THE CURRENT SOURCE CODE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
2
3
WHEREAS, in the course of the discovery process, a dispute arose between Plaintiffs and
Defendant Facebook, Inc. (the “Parties”) regarding the production of Facebook’s source code;
WHEREAS, on April 13, 2015, the Court entered a Discovery Order Re: Source Code
4
Briefing Schedule (“April 13, 2015 Order”) (Dkt. No. 68);
5
6
WHEREAS, a subsequent dispute arose over the availability for deposition of Alex
7
Himel, an employee of Facebook whose declaration accompanied Facebook’s source-code-
8
related discovery production of June 1, 2015;
9
10
11
WHEREAS, on June 12, 2015, the Court entered an Order Denying Telephonic Discovery
Conference Without Prejudice and Setting Deposition and Briefing Schedule (“June 12, 2015
Order”) (Dkt. No. 88), establishing a revised briefing schedule regarding source code production
12
13
14
and ordering Alex Himel to appear for deposition on July 1, 2015;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred, coming to an agreement with regard both
15
to the production of source code and to continuing the deposition of Alex Himel. Specifically,
16
subject to the entry of an amended protective order governing the treatment of source code,
17
Facebook has agreed to produce source code responsive to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests for the
18
time period September 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012. The Parties have met and conferred in
19
good faith and have not identified any issues of disagreement related to the scope of the source
20
21
code production. However, in the event that a dispute arises as to whether particular portions of
22
the source code are responsive or relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims, the Parties have agreed to meet
23
and confer in a good-faith attempt to resolve the dispute. If they cannot reach agreement, the
24
Parties will brief the dispute for the Court. Accordingly, by agreement of the Parties, the
25
deposition of Alex Himel scheduled for July 1, 2015 has been continued to a date yet to be
26
determined.
27
28
-1-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING THE DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL
AND REMOVING THE CURRENT SOURCE CODE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
2
3
NOW, THEREFORE, subject to approval of the Court, the Parties hereby stipulate and
request that the Court enter an order allowing the postponement of the deposition of Alex Himel
and removing from the calendar the deadlines associated with such briefing set by the Court in its
4
April 13, 2015 Order and as amended in the Court’s June 12, 2015 Order, including the hearing
5
6
date of August 13, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,
7
8
Dated: June 26, 2015
9
By:
10
/s/ Michael W. Sobol
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class
11
12
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
Dated: June 26, 2015
13
GIBSON, DUNN, & CRUTCHER, LLP
By:
14
/s/ Joshua A. Jessen
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
15
16
17
ATTORNEY ATTESTATION
18
19
20
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I, Michael W. Sobol, hereby attest that concurrence in
the filing of this document has been obtained from Joshua A. Jessen.
21
22
23
24
25
Dated: June 26, 2015
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN &
BERNSTEIN, LLP
By:
/s/ Michael W. Sobol
Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed
Class
26
27
28
-2-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING THE DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL
AND REMOVING THE CURRENT SOURCE CODE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
2
3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that,
subject to the entry of an amended protective order governing the treatment of source code,
4
Facebook has agreed to produce source code responsive to Plaintiffs’ discovery requests for the
5
6
time period September 1, 2009 to December 31, 2012. The Parties have met and conferred in
7
good faith and have not identified any issues of disagreement related to the scope of the source
8
code production. However, in the event that a dispute arises as to whether particular portions of
9
the source code are responsive or relevant to Plaintiffs’ claims, the Parties will meet and confer in
10
11
a good-faith attempt to resolve the dispute. If they cannot reach agreement, the Parties will brief
the dispute for the Court.
12
13
14
Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the Parties Stipulation. It is HEREBY ORDERED that:
the deposition of Alex Himel scheduled for July 1, 2015 has been continued to a date yet to be
15
determined, Plaintiffs will not file a motion to compel related to the source code at this time, and
16
the deadlines associated with such briefing set by the Court in its April 13, 2015 Order and as
17
amended in the Court’s June 12, 2015 Order, including the hearing date of August 13, 2015, shall
18
be taken off calendar.
19
20
21
22
DATED: _______________________
__________________________________
The Honorable Maria-Elena James
United States Magistrate Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CONTINUING THE DEPOSITION OF ALEX HIMEL
AND REMOVING THE CURRENT SOURCE CODE
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?