Motorola Mobility, Inc. et al v. TiVo Inc.

Filing 14

ORDER SETTING HEARING re 1 MOTION to Compel Google to Produce Documents in Response to Subpoena filed by TiVo Inc.. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 23, 2013. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/23/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. and GENERAL INSTRUMENT CORP., 12 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, v. TIVO INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-80015 PSG ORDER SETTING HEARING RE: STATUS OF TIVO INC.’S MOTION TO COMPEL (Re: Docket No. 1) Tivo, Inc. (“Tivo”) seeks to compel Google Inc. (“Google”) to provide responsive documents to a subpoena relating to a patent infringement suit in the Eastern District of Texas 18 between Tivo and Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“Motorola”), a Google subsidiary. Google noted in its 19 20 opposition that Tivo ought to secure the documents from Motorola rather than seek them from 21 Google. Tivo stated in its reply and at the hearing that it indeed had filed in the Eastern District of 22 Texas a motion to compel Motorola to produce similar documents but that it believed Google had 23 other responsive materials. It also filed a motion to compel production of documents against Arris 24 Group Inc. (“Arris”), yet another entity that may have the documents Tivo wants. 25 The court has learned from its own research that the parties resolved those motions to 26 compel prior to a hearing with Judge Gilstrap. Given that no party informed the court of the 27 28 resolutions, let alone the details of the discovery negotiations, the court is unclear what, if any, 1 Case No.: 13-80015 PSG ORDER 1 dispute remains between Tivo and Google regarding Google’s production. The parties therefore 2 shall appear for a telephonic hearing tomorrow, May 24, 2013 at 10:30 a.m., to explain the status of 3 Tivo’s motion. The parties should be prepared to explain to the court exactly what documents Tivo 4 obtained from Motorola and Arris that overlap with Tivo’s request to Google and what responsive 5 documents, if any, Tivo believes Google possesses that Tivo has not yet received. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: May 23, 2013 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 13-80015 PSG ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?