Torbov v. Cenlar Agency, Inc

Filing 101

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON 91 MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ADDRESSING BRIEFING OF MOTION. Reply due by 4/3/2015. Motion Hearing set for 4/9/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Signed by Judge Beth Labson Freeman on 3/27/2015. (blflc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 TSVETEN S TORBOV, Case No. 14-cv-00130-BLF Plaintiff, 8 v. 9 10 CENLAR AGENCY, INC., et al., ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ADDRESSING BRIEFING OF MOTION Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed on December 19, 2014 and set for hearing on 14 April 2, 2015. Under the Court’s Civil Local Rules, any opposition was due within fourteen days 15 after the filing of the motion. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). Plaintiff filed opposition approximately three 16 and one-half months after that deadline, on March 24, 2015. See Pl.’s Opp., ECF 98-99. The 17 opposition indicates that Plaintiff retained new counsel earlier in March and that counsel 18 submitted the opposition after researching the facts of the case and obtaining relevant documents. 19 Defendants are granted until April 3, 2015 to file a reply brief responding to the 20 substantive arguments raised in Plaintiff’s opposition. Defendants are not precluded from arguing 21 in the reply brief that the Court should not consider Plaintiff’s untimely opposition. 22 23 24 The hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss is continued from April 2, 2015 to April 9, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 27 28 Dated: March 27, 2015 ______________________________________ BETH LABSON FREEMAN United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?