DiTirro v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 10

STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint filed by Facebook, Inc.. (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 1/21/2014)

1

6

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13

SAN JOSE DIVISION

14
15

ANTHONY DITIRRO, KATYA
BRESLER, AND MICHELLE
SHUMATE, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated,

Case No. 5:14-cv-00132-PSG
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO F IRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a))

16
Plaintiffs,
17

Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:

v.
18
19
20

5
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
None Set

FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PSG

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Anthony DiTirro, Katya Bresler,

2

and Michelle Shumate (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”)

3

(Plaintiffs and Facebook, collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.

4
5

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States
District Court, Northern District of California, on January 9, 2014 (the “Complaint”);

6

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served the Complaint on Facebook on January 10, 2014;

7

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in the above-entitled

8

action on January 15, 2014;

9
10

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs served the First Amended Complaint on Facebook on January 17,
2014;

11
12

WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and 15(a)(1)(3), the
current deadline for Facebook to respond to the FAC is January 31, 2014;

13
14

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a
court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to a complaint; and

15
16

WHEREAS, extending the date for Facebook to respond to the FAC as set forth below
will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

17

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree that Facebook’s deadline to

18

respond to the FAC (answer, move, or otherwise respond) is extended to and including Tuesday,

19

March 4, 2014.

20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21

//

22

//

23

//

24

//

25

/

26

//

27

//

28

//

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PSG

1

Dated: January 17, 2014

COOLEY LLP

2
3
4
5

/s/ Jeffery M. Gutkin
Jeffrey M. Gutkin
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.
COUNSELONE, P.C.

6
7
8

/s/ Anthony J. Orshansky
Anthony J. Orshansky
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

9
10

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1

11

I, Jeffrey M. Gutkin, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation to Extend

12

Time to Respond to Complaint (L.R. 6-1(a)) has been obtained from the other signatory. I

13

declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing

14

is true and correct. Executed this 17th day of January, 2014, at San Francisco, California.

15
16

/s/ Jeffery M. Gutkin
Jeffrey M. Gutkin

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PSG