DiTirro v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 19

STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (L.R. 6-1(a)) filed by Facebook, Inc.. (Gutkin, Jeffrey) (Filed on 3/10/2014) Modified on 3/11/2014 (vlkS, COURT STAFF).

1

6

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
([e-mail])
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972)
([e-mail])
JEFFREY M. GUTKIN (216083)
([e-mail])
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

7

Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.

2
3
4
5

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

OAKLAND DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16
17
18

ANTHONY DITIRRO, KATYA
BRESLER, AND MICHELLE
SHUMATE, individually and on behalf of
others similarly situated,

Case No. 5:14-cv-00132-PJH
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND
TO F IRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (L.R. 6-1(a))

Plaintiffs,
v.

Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:

3
Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton
None Set

FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PJH

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiffs Anthony DiTirro, Katya Bresler,

2

and Michelle Shumate (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”)

3

(Plaintiffs and Facebook, collectively “the Parties”), by and through their respective counsel.

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States

5

District Court, Northern District of California, on January 9, 2014 (the “Complaint”) and served

6

the Complaint on Facebook on January 10, 2014;

7
8

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in the above-entitled
action on January 15, 2014 and served the FAC on Facebook on January 17, 2014;

9
10

WHEREAS, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and 15(a)(1)(3), the
deadline for Facebook to respond to the FAC was January 31, 2014;

11

WHEREAS, on January 21, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to

12

Respond to First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which extended

13

Facebook’s time to respond to the FAC to March 4, 2014, and which did not require a Court order

14

(Dkt. No. 10);

15

WHEREAS, on February 11, 2014, the Parties filed a Stipulation to Extend Time to

16

Respond to First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), which extended

17

Facebook’s time to respond to the FAC to March 25, 2014, and which did not require a Court

18

order (Dkt. No. 13);

19
20

WHEREAS, under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a
court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to a complaint; and

21
22

WHEREAS, further extending the date for Facebook to respond to the FAC as set forth
below will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

23

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), the Parties hereby stipulate and

24

agree that Facebook’s deadline to respond to the FAC (answer, move, or otherwise respond) is

25

extended to and including Tuesday, April 15, 2014.

26

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

27

//

28

//

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PJH

1

Dated: March 10, 2014

COOLEY LLP

2
/s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin
Jeffrey M. Gutkin
Attorneys for Defendant Facebook, Inc.

3
4
5

LAW OFFICES OF TODD M. FRIEDMAN, P.C.

6

/s/ Todd M. Friedman
Todd M. Friedman
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

7
8
9

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1

10
I, Jeffrey M. Gutkin, attest that concurrence in the filing of this Stipulation to Extend
11
Time to Respond to First Amended Complaint (L.R. 6-1(a)) has been obtained from the other
12
signatory. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that
13
the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 10th day of March, 2014, at San Francisco,
14
California.
15
/s/ Jeffrey M. Gutkin
Jeffrey M. Gutkin

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1356565/SF

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO FAC
CASE NO. 5:14-CV-00132-PJH