Klay v. Santa Cruz County Sheriff's Office et al
Filing
103
ORDER MODIFYING CASE SCHEDULE (granting 98 , 99 as modified). Jury Selection set for 6/27/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Jury Trial set for 6/27/2016 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Pretrial Conference set for 6/2/2016 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. Motion Hearing set for 6/18/2015 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Beth Labson Freeman. (blflc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2015)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SAN JOSE DIVISION
5
6
KRISTOPHER KLAY,
Case No. 14-cv-00326-BLF
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER MODIFYING CASE
SCHEDULE
8
9
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE,
[RE: ECF 98, 99]
Defendant.
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
The parties have filed stipulated requests for modification of the case schedule, see ECF
12
13
98, 99, including continuance of pending hearing dates, related deadlines, and trial. The parties’
14
stipulated requests are GRANTED as modified:
(1)
15
The hearing on Defendant City of South Lake Tahoe’s motion to dismiss and
16
motion to change venue, currently set for May 7, 2015, is CONTINUED to June 18, 2015 at 9:00
17
a.m.
18
(2)
The hearing on Defendant City of South Lake Tahoe’s motion for summary
19
judgment, currently set for May 7, is VACATED. The hearing and a briefing schedule will be re-
20
set by the Court, if appropriate, following disposition of the pending motion to dismiss and motion
21
to transfer.
22
(3)
23
The fact discovery cut-off, expert discovery cut-off, and deadline to complete ADR
are EXTENDED to July 10, 2015.
24
(4)
The final pretrial conference is CONTINUED to June 2, 2016.
25
(5)
Trial is CONTINUED to June 27, 2016.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
28
Dated: April 27, 2015
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?