Sharp v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al

Filing 9

ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 4/1/2014. (hrllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2014)

Download PDF
*E-Filed: April 1, 2014* 1 2 3 NOT FOR CITATION 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 TODD SHARP, ET AL., No. C14-00831 HRL Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER THAT CASE BE REASSIGNED TO A DISTRICT JUDGE v. 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE, LLC, ET AL., 11 Defendants. ____________________________________/ 12 On March 4, 2014, Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. Pursuant to Civil 13 14 Local Rule 73-1, all parties were required to file, no later than March 31, 2014, either (1) a Consent 15 to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge or (2) a Declination to Proceed Before a 16 Magistrate Judge and Request for Reassignment to a United States District Judge. Despite 17 reminders from the court, not all parties have done so. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT the 18 Clerk of the Court shall reassign this case to a District Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636; Civ. L.R. 73-1. 19 All current dates and deadlines are VACATED. 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 1, 2014 23 24 25 26 27 28 HOWARD R. LLOYD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 C14-00831 HRL Order will be electronically mailed to: 2 Glenn Edwin Stern glennstern@sternatlaw.com 3 Mary Kate Sullivan mks@severson.com, jc@severson.com, vhn@severson.com 4 Robert Travis Campbell 5 Thomas Nathaniel Abbott 6 Counsel are responsible for distributing copies of this document to co-counsel who have not registered for e-filing under the court’s CM/ECF program. rtc@severson.com, clk@severson.com tna@severson.com, dgl@severson.com, jc@severson.com 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?