Lam v. City Of San Jose et al
Filing
29
CASE SCHEDULING ORDER re 27 Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on October 30, 2014 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
HUNG LAM,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
13
14
CITY OF SAN JOSE, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
(Re: Docket No. 27)
IT IS ORDERED that the presumptive limits on discovery set forth in the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure shall apply to this case.
21
22
CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
conference on October 14, 2014, 1
19
20
Case No. 5:14-cv-00877-PSG
Based on the parties’ joint case management statement and the case management
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline for joinder of any additional parties, or other
amendments to the pleadings, is 120 days after entry of this order.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties participate in a neutral evaluation with United
24
25
26
States Magistrate Judge Howard Lloyd. The parties shall contact him within 14 days to schedule
the evaluation on or before February 20, 2015.
27
28
1
See Docket No. 28.
1
Case No. 5:14-cv-00877-PSG
CASE SCHEDULING ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?