DeRouen v. David et al
Filing
9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/16/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
ERIC DAYTON DEROUEN,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. CLARENE DAVID, et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. C 14-1080 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On March 7, 2014, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a federal civil rights complaint
19
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.1 The same day, the clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid the
20
filing fee, nor had he filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Along with the
21
deficiency notice, plaintiff was provided with an IFP application and instructions for completing
22
23
24
25
it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that his failure to either file a completed IFP application or pay
the filing fee within twenty-eight days would result in the dismissal of this action. On March 27,
2014, plaintiff filed a letter in which he stated that the filing fee would be paid in full because
plaintiff was to be released prior to the deadline. More than twenty-eight days have passed and
26
27
28
1
This action was reassigned to this court on April 2, 2014, after plaintiff failed to consent
to magistrate judge jurisdiction. (Docket No. 5.)
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\DeRouen080disifp.wpd
1
plaintiff has not paid his filing fee, filed a completed IFP application, or made any further
2
contact with the court.
3
4
5
6
Thus, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The clerk shall terminate all
pending motions, enter judgment, and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
4/16/14
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Dismissal
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.14\DeRouen080disifp.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?