Lee v. Ho et al
Filing
38
ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS re 20 , 22 . Signed by Hon. Beth Labson Freeman on 7/1/2014. (blflc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2014)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
7
JENNIFER LEE,
Case No. 14-cv-01127-BLF
Plaintiff,
8
v.
ORDER TERMINATING MOTIONS
9
10
SHELBY HO, et al.,
[Re: ECF Nos. 20, 22]
Defendants.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
On June 17, 2014, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint. (ECF 34) The Federal
14
Rules permit a party to amend its pleading “once as a matter of course” within “21 days after
15
service of a motion under Rule 12(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(B). An amended complaint
16
supersedes the original. Loux v. Rhay, 375 F.2d 55, 57 (9th Cir. 1967); see also Connectu LLC v.
17
Zuckerberg, 522 F.3d 82, 91 (1st Cir. 2008).
18
Because Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint now stands as the operative pleading,
19
Defendants’ motions to dismiss the original complaint, (ECF 20, 22), filed May 28, 2014, are
20
hereby terminated as moot.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 1, 2014
______________________________________
BETH LABSON FREEMAN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?