Adaptix, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filing 146

CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 14, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ADAPTIX, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AMAZON.COM, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ADAPTIX, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ADAPTIX, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) HTC CORPORATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:14-cv-01385-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:14-cv-02359-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 27 28 1 Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; -00167; -00168 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 1 2 3 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. HTC CORPORATION, et al., 4 Defendants. 5 6 7 8 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al., 9 Defendants. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ZTE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:14-cv-02360-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:14-cv-02894-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:14-cv-02895-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:15-cv-00165-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:15-cv-00166-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 26 27 28 2 Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; -00167; -00168 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER 1 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, 2 3 v. ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 4 Defendants. 5 6 ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, 7 8 v. ZTE CORPORATION, et al., 9 Defendants. United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:15-cv-00167-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Case No. 5:15-cv-00168-PSG CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Plaintiff Adaptix, Inc. claims Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Sony Mobile 12 Communications, Inc., HTC Corporation, Kyocera Corporation, ZTE Corporation, Verizon 13 Wireless, Dell, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Sprint Spectrum L.P. infringe United States Patent 14 Nos. 6,947,748 and 7,454,212. Consistent with Pat. L.R. 4-3(c), the parties seek construction of 15 one claim term. 1 The parties appeared for a hearing on the matters at hand earlier today. To avoid 16 unnecessary delay, the court proceeds to issue its construction without its full reasoning and 17 analysis: 18 19 20 PATENT NO. CLAIM TERM/PHRASE CONSTRUCTION ’212 “continuously monitors” “checks without interruption” The parties should rest assured that the court arrived at these constructions with a full 21 22 appreciation of not only the relevant intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, but also the Federal Circuit’s 23 teaching in Phillips v. AWH Corp., 2 and its progeny. So that the parties may pursue whatever 24 recourse they believe is necessary, a complete opinion will issue before entry of any judgment. 25 1 26 27 See Case No. 14-cv-01379: Docket No. 139. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the court adopts by reference its ruling on claim construction from the “Wave 1” cases. See Case No. 13-cv-01776PSG: Docket No. 158. The parties do not waive their right to appeal those constructions by agreeing to have them apply in these “Wave 2” cases. 2 28 415 F.3d 1303, 1312-15 (Fed. Cir. 2005). 3 Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166; -00167; -00168 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?