Adaptix, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
Filing
146
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on May 14, 2015 (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
ADAPTIX, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
AMAZON.COM, INC., et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
ADAPTIX, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS, INC., )
et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
ADAPTIX, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
HTC CORPORATION, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:14-cv-01385-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:14-cv-02359-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
27
28
1
Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166;
-00167; -00168
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
1
2
3
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
HTC CORPORATION, et al.,
4
Defendants.
5
6
7
8
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al.,
9
Defendants.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
KYOCERA CORPORATION, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZTE CORPORATION, et al.,
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
ZTE CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:14-cv-02360-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:14-cv-02894-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:14-cv-02895-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:15-cv-00165-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:15-cv-00166-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
26
27
28
2
Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166;
-00167; -00168
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
1
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
2
3
v.
ZTE CORPORATION, et al.,
4
Defendants.
5
6
ADAPTIX, INC.,
Plaintiff,
7
8
v.
ZTE CORPORATION, et al.,
9
Defendants.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:15-cv-00167-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Case No. 5:15-cv-00168-PSG
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Plaintiff Adaptix, Inc. claims Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Sony Mobile
12
Communications, Inc., HTC Corporation, Kyocera Corporation, ZTE Corporation, Verizon
13
Wireless, Dell, Inc., AT&T Mobility LLC and Sprint Spectrum L.P. infringe United States Patent
14
Nos. 6,947,748 and 7,454,212. Consistent with Pat. L.R. 4-3(c), the parties seek construction of
15
one claim term. 1 The parties appeared for a hearing on the matters at hand earlier today. To avoid
16
unnecessary delay, the court proceeds to issue its construction without its full reasoning and
17
analysis:
18
19
20
PATENT
NO.
CLAIM TERM/PHRASE
CONSTRUCTION
’212
“continuously monitors”
“checks without interruption”
The parties should rest assured that the court arrived at these constructions with a full
21
22
appreciation of not only the relevant intrinsic and extrinsic evidence, but also the Federal Circuit’s
23
teaching in Phillips v. AWH Corp., 2 and its progeny. So that the parties may pursue whatever
24
recourse they believe is necessary, a complete opinion will issue before entry of any judgment.
25
1
26
27
See Case No. 14-cv-01379: Docket No. 139. Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the court adopts
by reference its ruling on claim construction from the “Wave 1” cases. See Case No. 13-cv-01776PSG: Docket No. 158. The parties do not waive their right to appeal those constructions by
agreeing to have them apply in these “Wave 2” cases.
2
28
415 F.3d 1303, 1312-15 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
3
Case No. 5:14-cv-01379-PSG; -01385; -02359; -02360; -02894; -02895; 15-00165; -00166;
-00167; -00168
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?